Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pieczęć Jagiełły.jpg

Original

Reason: Good technically photo which presents interesting and uncommon thing.
Proposed caption: Royal seal of King Władysław II Jagiełło of Poland (copy).
Articles this image appears in: Jogaila
Creator: Lestat - Jan Mehlich [1]

Support as nominator Lestath 19:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ I like it, sharp, clear, good contrast with the background - my only problem with it is that in thumb form it looks a bit odd, the center figure being difficult to set apart from the rest - maybe I just to need to put on my glasses o.0: . Cheers. --Mad Tinman 19:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Neutral~~ untill authenticity concerns are answered. --Mad Tinman _T _C 19:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose per Spikebrennan. --Mad Tinman _T _C 12:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question is this object a copy and not an original? This diminishes its encyclopedic value. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 21:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image page itself seems to say that it's a copy. Spikebrennan 02:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~, high quality picture, but neutral until the above question has been answered. --Aqwis 22:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per jjron and Spikebrennan. --Aqwis 14:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support The authenticity must be verified.--Here T oHelp 23:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mainly on encyclopaedic grounds. I don't think the seal is so much as mentioned in the article (much less described), and the seal seems entirely irrelevant to the section it's in, so I don't see what encyclopaedic value it is adding. OK for Commons, but needs encyclopaedic value here. --jjron 00:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The dark background is distracting-- why not use image editing to replace it with white? Spikebrennan 02:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 11:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]