Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Real Kaui Panorama1.jpg
Kaui Panorama edit
- Reason
- I think it is a great picture and illustrative of the coast.
- Articles this image appears in
- Kauai, Nā Pali Coast State Park
- Creator
- Remember but User: MattWright did a lot of the fixing up by computer
- Support as nominator — Remember 14:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Support - Very good image.But my only concern is the blown out sky. Looks like I didn't pay enough attention. --Arad 14:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)- Oppose. Some pretty hefty stitching faults, bon-bon colors, and overexposure of the sky. --Dschwen 14:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Granted, it must have been hard to assemble, as (I assume) it was shot from a boat. Please comment on the realism of the colors. --Dschwen 15:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was shot on a shaky boat so the stiching was hard to do. If anyone knows how to fix the obvious error I would greatly appreciate it. As for the colors I believe they are all the same as when shot (I'm not exactly sure what MattWright did), but I know a little bit of blue sky was added to the top left to make the picture even. Remember 15:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you give me the originals I could try a restitch. I cannot promise anything if there was too much movement between the shots, and it won't make the pic an FP for me either because of the exposure issues. But for the article a fixed stitch would definitely be worth the trouble. --Dschwen 08:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you think this has stitching areas, take a look at the original... I would seriously advocate a restitch by Dschwen. Until then I have to
Oppose on technical grounds. E9T3A7. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you think this has stitching areas, take a look at the original... I would seriously advocate a restitch by Dschwen. Until then I have to
- If you give me the originals I could try a restitch. I cannot promise anything if there was too much movement between the shots, and it won't make the pic an FP for me either because of the exposure issues. But for the article a fixed stitch would definitely be worth the trouble. --Dschwen 08:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was shot on a shaky boat so the stiching was hard to do. If anyone knows how to fix the obvious error I would greatly appreciate it. As for the colors I believe they are all the same as when shot (I'm not exactly sure what MattWright did), but I know a little bit of blue sky was added to the top left to make the picture even. Remember 15:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Blown sky and the loss of detail in the shadows to the right are minor detractors, but my major concern is the huge jump in the shore about one third way to the right. It just jumps up! Thegreenj 14:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Thegreenj. 8thstar 20:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Thegreenj. Witty lama 03:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks for the feedback. I was pretty sure this was going to fail, but I a variety of positive feedback on the picture so I thought I would give it a shot. Any idea how I can remove this picture from being nominated? Remember 13:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- An FPC 'admin' as it were will close the nom for you. Next time you're not sure if it's going to fail or not, take it to Picture peer review to get some feedback. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- This was on peer review already. ~ trialsanderrors 16:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- An FPC 'admin' as it were will close the nom for you. Next time you're not sure if it's going to fail or not, take it to Picture peer review to get some feedback. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted (withdrawn by nominator) --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
