Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Morning Fog at GGB.JPG

Morning Fog at GGB edit

Original

Reason: Stunning picture - FP on Commons.

Articles this image appears in: Golden Gate Bridge
Creator: Grombo

regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support reasons see above. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - low technical quality and it's not among best work in Wikipedia. (It's a nice picture but no FP.)--Svetovid (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Where exactly was the creator standing when he took this? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The walkway extends outwards around the pylons. Been there, taken the same pic :-) --Dschwen 03:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Not the best representation for the GGB. crassic!^[talk] 01:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Easy pic to get (see above), not really a good photo in the encyclopedic sense. Something taken of the bridge from the headlands might be better for our purposes. (Yes, the walkway does a little detour around the bridge pylons, so no safety rules were compromised.) --Dhartung | Talk 04:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Heeey, what's that supposed to mean? If I can shoot it, anybody can? ;o) --Dschwen 04:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Safety rules? Years of FPCs and that is singularly the dumbest oppose reason that was almost made. :D\=< (talk) 12:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Low encyclopedic value. howcheng {chat} 17:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oppose but simply because a better pic is so doable. Go back on a sunday morning and wait until there are no cars. Also a wider angle would be nice. Potatoswatter (talk) 06:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]