Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Artamus leucorynchus - Wonga.jpg
White-breasted Woodswallow edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2011 at 10:36:05 (UTC)
- Reason
- Nice image of this species
- Articles in which this image appears
- White-breasted Woodswallow
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 10:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I don't think this is the most encyclopedic pose for a species named for the colour of it's breast. In fact, I think the previous taxobox image was probably better in the taxobox. --99of9 (talk) 11:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've got one of the front, but I think the tail is missing. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Glad it wasn't called the red ass bird. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Fully agree with 99of9. --Elekhh (talk) 23:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose agreeing with 99of9 and Elkhh. Pine (was GreenPine) talk 09:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support I think the pose is really good, there’ll always be a compromise with pose as you can’t see the whole of the animal in one photo. Just because it's called a white-breasted whatever doesn't mean that I want to see only a picture of it's breast. There is a shallow depth of field (if that’s what it’s called), but I think it meets the 8 criteria. TehGrauniad (talk) 14:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per 99of9. It's a great picture though -- I'd probably support it if the article were longer and it wasn't in the taxobox. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Have to agree with the consensus from 99of9. It's a stunning image visually but just a shame it's not from the front otherwise I'd support 100%. Regards, Fallschirmjäger ✉ 18:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
