User talk:Wakowako/Archive

(Redirected from User talk:Wakowako/Archive. 2012)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Wakowako in topic Merging

May 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nueva Ecija, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy ofverifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Bluemask (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Changed some resources outside of wikipedia such as books and articles which I think as a reliable source as per comment of Bluemask to maintain the policy ofverifiability--Wakowako (talk) 07:55, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


June 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Scouts Royale Brotherhood, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


A cupcake for you! edit

  You are improving fast...Naraht (talk) 19:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Wakowako, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it includedcopyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
  • Agree, the article is from the newspaper. I'll try to improve in creating an article by myself. Thank you.--Wakowako (talk) 05:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Central Luzon State University Hymn.ogg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Central Luzon State University Hymn.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks(talk) 06:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Central Luzon State University Hymn.ogg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Central Luzon State University Hymn.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot(talk) 04:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have improved a little edit

I have one article that was approved on wikipedia. Thanks alot. Some articles have been deleted and was not approved. But the Tanduyong Festival has been moved to the article section. Thank you wikipedia.--Wakowako (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Possible project. edit

There are still a lot of the Philippine Colleges and Universities that have pages (even if stub pages) in tl.wikipedia.org that don't exist in en.wikipedia.org. Creating the equivalent stubs over on en.wikipedia.org would be useful. See List of colleges and universities in the Philippines for the current state... I know that your tendencies may be more toward being a WP:Wikidragon than aWP:Wikignome, but it is perhaps something to think about.Naraht(talk) 10:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Yes, i've been thinking that also, and of course, I wanted to be a WP:Wikidragon. Cheers!! I will try my best.--Wakowako (talk) 06:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • I tend to be a Wikignome expect for two things, Alpha Phi Omega and Fraternity/Sorority National Convention lists. OTOH, by creating these stubs, you'll probably have more articles created than I do. :) Also, there is generally enough reference-able information to support a stub for most Colleges and Universities in the Philippines and the stubs tend to naturally write themselves in Neutral Point of View.Naraht (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Please do not erase talk page content, unless it is being archived.--J (t) 05:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Wakowako. You have new messages at Jeffwang's talk page.
Message added 06:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

J (t) 06:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

 Template:Central Luzon State University has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Jenks24 (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, my gallery edit

I was advised months ago to put my tons of images in the gallery of show and hide. I share the sentiment of yours, that I put to many images, when the article is barely on its better state of expansion, with just few links and very few sentences, stubs, so to speak. Hence, I opted to put these precious images of heritage districts and churches in Wikipedia hide and show gallery. I know that this style for imagery is very detrimental to those Filipinos who are not so keen or knowledgeable about internet, like the old horses, the professionals who use manual typewriters. But most of my edits or rather 70% of them use the show image gallery, too many images. I am not offended if any editor would edit my images, for I know that I am only 1 of the editors of the evolving articles. Cheers and thanks for your thoughts that I learned to improve Wikipedia imaging (See for example TheMetropolitan Cathedral of San Fernando Image Gallery). Cheers again.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 08:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply



Philippine Colleges and Universities edit

Given your specialty and your knowledge, you might consider working on adding Philippine Colleges and Universities to the English Language Wikipedia. My belief is that most if not all schools in[1] that aren't already in Category:Universities_and_colleges_in_the_Philippines should be added to the English Language wikipedia (and the category). Examples include:Guzman College of Science and Technology , Saint Peter's College , and Philippine Al-Islamia. Naraht (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Trimmed down the history (especially the non-non neutral poiont of view stuff), it was a Copyright violation in the form it was ofhttp://www.guzmancollege.edu.ph/about_us.html. There are still some places where it doesn't seem quite encyclopedic. Take a look at Far Eastern University. That might serve as a model/goal. I know that most articles on Philippine Universities won't be that complete, though. But *trust* me, both GCST & and St. Peter's are good starts and others will add to the articles.Naraht (talk) 16:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guzman College of Science and Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


AFD for Tau Gamma Phi edit

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tau Gamma Phi.Naraht (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ese Te Ese edit

Hello, Wakowako, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Ese Te Ese, appears to be directly copied fromhttp://encycl.opentopia.com/term/Satanas. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Ese Te Ese if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ese Te Ese edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ese Te Ese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administratoruserfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ese Te Ese for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ese Te Ese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ese Te Ese until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Curve edit

You wrote: "Thanks for creating Rare and Unreleased (Curve album), Deepblue1!

Wikipedia editor Wakowako just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article should be merged to article Curve (band)

"

I'm still working on that article. Leave it some time to develop. Deepblue1 (talk) 12:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


MyJobMatcher page edit

Hello WakoWako

Thanks for your message and my apologies for having content that seems to be promotional. My profession and expertise is in the online recruitment, job board and employment website space. Reading the content currently written on Wikipedia their is an awful lot of information that needs improving and adding which I would like to become trusted with to take ownership off and managing building up an accurate information base for this area.

If you allow me I will continue to add to the MyJobMatcher page and add other pages, improving content of some of the existing information written. However I will admit I am still getting my head around the way Wiki works and the methodology of including the information.

Many thanks

EmploymentGuy — Preceding unsigned comment added byEmploymentGuy (talkcontribs) 14:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply




Page curation edit

Hi Wakowako! I've come across a few of the recent articles you have patrolled and wanted to touch bases on a couple of things. Specifically, you commented at User talk:Lkayblkayb, that you had concerns with a lack of notability and had identified some issues through some maintenance templates. Unfortunately, there is a bit of inconsistency with some guidelines, so I just wanted to offer some help. Page curation is our first line of defense against unwanted pages or for improvement of poorly written or constructed pages and it must be done accurately. It is not only important to identify issues, but equally important to fix the most outstanding ones. When you place an "unreferenced" template on an article, I think you may actually be looking for the "no footnotes" template. For example, take a look at Mary Weston Fordham. It would have been rather simple to make a quick cleanup and restructuring here. Even add a category. While there is a lack of footnotes, or inline citations, there are actually four references provided in this article. Poorly formatted, it would have taken less than a minute to clean this up. You mention at User talk:Lkayblkayb that there is no evidence of notability, but the article clearly establishes notability in accordance with the general notability guidelines, or WP:BIO. Hope this helps. Your work is certainly appreciated. Please feel free to contact me anytime you need help or have any questions. (No, really!) Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 10:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've also noticed you've tagged several articles with the {{autobiography}} template when there was no clear evidence of such (Alexander Perceval (merchant), for example, is a deceased person). If the username of the editor is a close match to the name of the article's subject, then that's stronger evidence of an autobiography or a conflict of interest. If you tag the article, you should also leave a warning notice ({{uw-autobiography}},{{uw-coi}} or {{uw-coi-username}}, whichever is most appropriate) on the editor's talk page. Cheers. --Drm310 (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Elimination of articles edit

Wako, thank you for your observations. I will make changes to those entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added byMarcelosoaresds (talkcontribs) 11:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


William Dixson edit

Hi Wakowako! Yes, I am curious about your reason for un-reviewing the page William Dixson, if you wouldn't mind providing a brief explanation. Was it an issue with its categories? Cheers! Zujua (talk) 07:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • No, it was a mistake, I have already marked it as reviewed, and add template on the talkpage. Sorry for that. Thank you.--Wakowako (talk) 07:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

A1 edit

Hi! I recently declined your tagging with A1 because the criteria is not eligible for the article. A1 (no context) only applies if the article has no contexts to define its subject (e.g. "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh"). Please see WP:CSD orWP:A1 for more info and please be more careful. Have a nice day! Maraming Salamat Po! :)Mediran talk to me! 09:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • Not accepted, the article has no context at all.


"Sukanta Biswas Vill-Duttapukur/dighra/phulbagan, the nice village with very wonderful natural environment, pin 743248"

--Wakowako (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrolling edit

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. Please return to Israelites and the Cow, a page that you recently patrolled and tagged but did not check for obvious WP:COPYVIO. I appreciate your enthusiasm to jump right and help maintain the quality of our articles, but as other editors have expressed concerns about your patrolling, I am asking you to stop patrolling pages until you have read and fully understood WP:Deletion and the patrollers' tutorial at WP:NPP. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Merging edit

May I ask you why this article is going to be merged into One Day International--Pratyya (have a chat?) 10:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


  • Your article only needsbto be merged to have the context of a much broader article to help the readers understand it well. No worry, its not a delete and the merge is just a proposal.--Wakowako (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Girichaitanya edit

Hello. Kindly look into the revisions in the article Chaitanya Giri. I have cited a couple of references in the article´s text that include the name Chaitanya Giri. I hope the article now meets your suggested norms. (talk) Chaitanya Giri 13:50, 19 December 2012 (CET)