Talk:Main Page

Main Page error reports

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

• Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
• Offer a correction if possible.
• References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
• Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 23:29 on 23 June 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
• Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
• Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
• No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
• Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
• Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Administrators: Clear all reports

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Errors in "Did you know ..."

Current DYK

This item perhaps unintentionally links to nonscientific opinion instead of information (rather than referencing the journal, whose existence is fact, it references an opinion in the journal which is not): "... that according to one creationist journal, HIV has its origins in the Fall?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.108.6.238 (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes, this is obviously very inappropriate and should be pulled (more to the point, it should never have been approved in the first place). It should hopefully go without saying that this is a WP:FRINGE view. Putting this fringe view on the WP:Main page like this, even with attribution, is in effect promoting it. TompaDompa (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

...does someone mind explaining how? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

How promoting fringe views on Wikipedia's main page is inappropriate? I'm not sure I understand the question. TompaDompa (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

The third sentence of the article is ARJ's research is not scientifically sound and it encourages readers to doubt mainstream scientific evidence. While yes, it's attributed, it's no different than someone trying to shoehorn the statement "HIV has its origins in the (biblical) Fall, according to Answers Research Journal" into an article on HIV. The statement would not fly even with perfect attribution to the named source anywhere else on Wikipedia. Yet not only is it on the main page now, but it doesn't even specify that this journal is "not scientifically sound". It makes a claim in Wikivoice that should not be made. Surprised this hasn't been pulled yet - but I have no problem with anyone workshopping alternate hooks for a future set and excepting the timeliness rule given this was approved initially and may be pulled now. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 19:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

It says "creationist journal" and that clearly labels it as fringe, doesn't it? I therefore cannot see what the problem is. Schwede66 19:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure "creationist journal" is specific enough, but if others feel it is, then I'll not push it. The term "journal", to the general public, gives the air of reputability to the "journal", even if it's not. While a term like "predatory journal" makes clear that it's a "journal in name only", I'm not sure that "creationist journal" does the same. I think if the word "Fall" was expanded to Biblical Fall, it would likely clarify enough too. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 20:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Errors in the summary of the featured list

Friday's FL

(June 28)

Monday's FL

(June 24, tomorrow)

Errors in the summary of the featured picture

Notice to administrators: When fixing POTD errors, please update the corresponding regular version (i.e. without "protected" in the page title) in addition to the Main Page version linked below.