Welcome!

Hello, Victoryosayi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 04:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article VibrantSharer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of VibrantSharer edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on VibrantSharer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of VibrantSharer for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VibrantSharer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VibrantSharer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with VibrantSharer. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:VibrantSharer logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:VibrantSharer logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:VibrantSharer logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:VibrantSharer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 (Talk) 03:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am going to delete everything except your article, which will surely be deleted after the deletion debate. You absolutely must not promote yourself here at Wikipedia.

I am happy to see that you started Iguododo and Eso (town). However, I am not happy to see that you added your name and website to one of them. Plus, they were both copy pasted, which is a copyright violation.

I would like to see you become an editor here. Are you interested in helping to build the encyclopedia without adding any content related to you or your organization? If so, please let me know and I will unblock you immediately. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Victoryosayi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am interested in becoming an editor and in helping to build the encyclopedia without adding any content related to you or your organization. Please unblock me

Accept reason:

I trust that you mean "your" organization. So, to be clear, please edit without promoting yourself. Happy editing. You are unblocked. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your username edit

One more thing. Please visit Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple and change your username. Please do not edit articles using this username any more because it is the name of your business. Remember, no promotional usernames or those which sound like a group are permitted. Thank you kindly. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Victorybiz has been my favourite nickname for a very long time and it is not a business name. Victorybiz is short for "Victory bizarre' meaning strange and unusual victory. May I have the privilege to continue using this username as it is my favourite. Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa 14:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Ah, okay. You are right. I was mixing it up with VibrantSharer. Of course, please continue with your present username. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Town images edit

Do you know what we would all just love? Images of the towns for the articles you created. You are in a very fascinating country. If you can start to take photos and upload them to Commons, this would be a huge asset to Wikipedia. I am talking about geographic locations, everyday objects household and other, food dishes, markets, animals, etc. You see, when you go to common articles, many of the images are from England, America, et cetera. Why shouldn't there be an image of a typical chair or bank teller or lawn mower that is from your great country? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I just looked and found zero images of bank tellers at commons, and the article has none. If you go into the bank and take a pic of a smiling bank teller at his or her post, behind that counter, I am sure you can add it to the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

You are right, I will do my best from now on to make more research and gather information and images from my location. Thanks for the guide and assistance you have rendered here, indeed I am grateful. Victory Osayi Airuoyuwa 14:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iguododo edit

Hello Victorybiz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Iguododo for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Roshan014. I have removed the deletion tag. I am not sure if tagging it was appropriate. Please tell us why this qualifies as WP:G5. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Thank you for your post Anna Frodesiak. I had made a deletion tag on the Article iguododo as this Article was in the list of the articles created by Banned or Blocked users.--Roshan014 (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Roshan014. Where is this list? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Osagie Ize-Iyamu edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Osagie Ize-Iyamu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pastorosagieizeiyamu.com/about/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Osagie Ize-Iyamu edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Osagie Ize-Iyamu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pastorosagieizeiyamu.com/about/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Squirrel (talk) 21:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about D. Policy edit

Hello, Victorybiz,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether D. Policy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Policy .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Dom from Paris (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply