Trans

edit

The film apparently won some minor award at the Berlin Film Festival, however, IMDB isn't a reliable source. If you look at the festivals website, you can find that it was in the competition, however the site doesn't show it winning anything. [1]. In fact, I can't even find an award called a Readers Jury Award on the site. Nor can I find where the film received "full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics", which would help it pass WP:NOTFILM. I found a couple of reviews in notable papers, but not by notable critics. You can read my whole reasoning here: WP:Articles for deletion/Trans (film). On a side note, I'll probably try to locate a copy to watch it, but I don't think it meets the criteria for inclusion in wikipedia. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Article

edit

I think that you should add the two reviews that you found and find a different source or sources for the Recognition section since there are some people here that don't consider it a reliable source for awards hence the factual accuracy tag that someone added (I'm one of the people that considers it a reliable source for awards). Joe Chill (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tell you what I'll do

edit

If this article gets kept (which I still think the film is not notable, but it's not my decision alone), I'll try to drive by one day and get you a pic of the Corkscrew store that you can decide if you want to use in the article. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Trans (film)

edit

I went through, added a few things, and trimmed down the reception quotations slightly, but added more. I also went through and cleaned up the reference format. You can take a look and see the preferred style for such. Nice article. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good job. I might have made it shorter.... but that's me. It looks good and you've done very well. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 02:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Ryandaughertytrans.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ryandaughertytrans.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 12:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm afraid the rationale still looks a bit thin to me, the purpose of a non-free use rationale is to provide an explanation (the more detail the better) for how the image significantly increase the readers understanding of the subject (and otherwise satisfy all the Wikipedia:Non-free criteria). Having the image just float next to the cast list for the purpose of "showing the main actor" (to paraphrase) is a bit thin if that's the only reason to include it since unless the actors appearance in the film is a topic of the article (elaborate makeup/costume or similar) seeing it is not necessarily needed for understanding the article. --Sherool (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Chalker.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chalker.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Chalker.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Joe Madureira

edit

Hi. Could you add a reliable source to the material you added to the Joe Madureira article? Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gilgamesh in popular culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • characters of the series, the immortal Aram Anni-Padda.<ref name="Archer & Armstrong #0 Interview">[http://comicbook.com/blog/2013/05/13/archer-armstrong-gilgamesh-fred-van-lente-on-the-zero-issue/</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CcBighits.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CcBighits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply