SparklingBlueMoon

Welcome!

This user is a Registered Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Hello, SparklingBlueMoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or .

Again, welcome! C F A 💬 22:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thanks for trying to intervene in that edit war, and for letting them know about BLPN. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Concerning the page Stefan Mross. Let me know if you need help providing correct attribution in the future! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve ZephyrMusic

Hello, SparklingBlueMoon,

Thank you for creating ZephyrMusic.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please do not remove the tag until you are absolutely sure it no longer meets the criteria, preferably by checking in with the person who originally placed it. The article still contains far too many details for an artist of his fame.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Darth Stabro}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 21:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Darth Stabro, yesterday I removed information that I considered irrelevant and reworded certain passages, I saw that you put the banner back so it was not enough, could you correct that? SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of ZephyrMusic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZephyrMusic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZephyrMusic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 22:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)