SouthernResidentOrca
A belated welcome!
editHere's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SouthernResidentOrca. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- And another welcome from me! Feel free to stop by my talk page any time, mate. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, SouthernResidentOrca. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Report about using inappropriate language
editYou have been reported for calling out names for a reason which could be discussed peacefully. U1Quattro (talk) 08:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC) U1Quattro (talk) 08:52, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Report information.
editI do not own that article neither am I connected with that article. I removed the information because it was established earlier that information about the records shall be stated in that section for which it is meant for. U1Quattro (talk) 09:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC) U1Quattro (talk) 09:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'm supporting the decision which was established earlier when an argument like that happened before about the matter you are arguing over. U1Quattro (talk) 09:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, SouthernResidentOrca. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit2022 Russian Invasion Infobox
editFYI, I think you did a good job with your list, as they had to reference it in their response, and had to at least be forced to admit no consensus:
Editors pointed to a number of other articles about wars that included
The only real point refernced in the conclusion was that "the box might be too long," which makes me think that if we started by just proposing "recon+intelligence" support--or some other, similar smaller category of support--that this objection would be pushed to the side and be able to win an RfC. Then with that established, later, this RfC could be brought up again to include the arms suppliers in the infobox as I think people would be used to it by then.
Also, FWIW, I kind of get the impression that the real, unsaid reason that people didn't want to list arms suppliers as the belligerents was because there's still a lot of people emotionally invested in portraying it as "Russia/Belarus/etc. v. Ukraine by themselves." That's to be expected, there's a lot of emotion being tied up with all of this at the moment. Fephisto (talk) 04:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. SouthernResidentOrca (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GM 6T40 transmission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aveo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
ethnicelebs.com as a reference
editHi SouthernResidentOrca. I noticed that you used ethnicelebs.com as a reference for biographical information in D'Arcy Carden. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. User:XLinkBot removes it automatically, but it doesn't catch all cases. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for letting me know. SouthernResidentOrca (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- I glanced at the references used by the ethnicelebs article. Most cannot be used per RSP, though it may be worthwhile to look through them for usable primary sources. --Hipal (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Response
editI replied to you on my talk page, in case you weren't notified for some reason. Hmm1994 (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.