Show-Truth
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, Show-Truth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Whatever404 (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I did make several improvements to the article. Perhaps the simplest way to establish notability is to provide references demonstrating the subject's significance in articles or other materials from major news sources (not blogs, personal websites, or the like). Whatever404 (talk) 14:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chima Simone
edit
A tag has been placed on Chima Simone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
I did make several improvements to the article. Perhaps the simplest way to establish notability is to provide references demonstrating the subject's significance in articles or other materials from major news sources (not blogs, personal websites, or the like). Whatever404 (talk) 14:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chima Simone
edit A tag has been placed on Chima Simone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. –túrianpatois 16:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
If you don't leave Chima Simone as a redirect, it's going to wind up being deleted. Please stop edit warring. See also WP:BLP. You must provide reliable sources for living persons. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I am an agent creating a bio page Chima Simone. You keep redirecting a perfectly credible bio. You stop edit warring! If you keep redirecting it when it's fine as is, I will revise it and have my lawyers on you in an instant.
- Please read WP:COI. You have a conflict of interest. Please also read WP:NLT. Unless you immediately witdraw the legal threat, you will be blocked from editing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon::==( o ) 20:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Show-Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Perfectly credible bio with reliable sources, Chima Simone shouldn't be redirected repeatedly by User: Who then was a gentleman? Bio revised nicely by User: Whatever404 & shouldn't be redirected. Revising my clients bio as needed due to redirects & edit warring. Will not make legal threats, but request move protection.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 21:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Be advised that you will not be unblocked unless you convincingly withdraw the legal threat and convince us that you understand and will abide by the various policies linked to above. Sandstein 21:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, besides that: this editor is Chima Simone's manager, and thus should not be editing an article about Chima Simone at all. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Show-Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
delete Chima Simone article and disable user: Show-Truth as administrators are showing unwarranted bias to user: Turian, User: who then was a gentleman & countless others. Also denying a neutral, reliable article it's place in Wiki. Prefer deletion over redirection. Thank you.
Decline reason:
We do not acquiesce to people with a clear conflict, and we cannot delete or disable accounts (aside from blocking them) besides. If you're that concerned, please contact our OTRS system. Secondly, accusing editors of bias tends to lead to declined unblock requests unless you can provide evidence - if there's bias, it's gonna be provable. -Jeremy (v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!) 23:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.