Saeed.Veradi

About	Friends	Edits	Images	Awards	Talk	Mail

Welcome!

Hello, Saeed.Veradi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! – Liveste (talk • edits) 21:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

from NSC-Engine

Hi, there. I have one favour to ask, from one engineer to another. Can you check above mentioned article and give your oppinion about should it be deleted or not, because, it is talking about our area of interest. Regards --Lasta 06:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Iranian Revolution

Hi there. You marked a line in Iranian Revolution as "(citation problem)".[1] Could you be a little more specific? What needs to be corrected? Thanks! --Falcorian ^(talk) 18:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles Detailed Plot. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Robotech: The Shadow Chronicles|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Picture Contributed to Abaqus

The picture you added Abaqus, while useful, spells the name of the product wrong. It is spelled with a Q, not a C. I'm removing the picture; feel free to put it back once the product is spelled correctly. - EndingPop (talk) 20:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please confirm your membership

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

Outline of science

Dear Saeed,

Thank you for your message concerning the Outline of science. You are totally welcome to edit any outline you wish. We have around 500 to choose from. The outlines are list articles, and like any other article or page on Wikipedia, they are open to being editied by anyone and everyone. No permission is required. The only times that access is restricted to general editors is when something goes wrong with a page and administrators protect it according to Wikipedia:Protection policy.

Please keep in mind that outlines are stand-alone lists and not prose articles. They are one of the subsystems of Wikipedia's navigation system. The essay Wikipedia:Outlines explains their format.

Have fun. I look forward to seeing the results of your efforts.

Sincerely, The Transhumanist 22:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Outline of science

I noticed your edits to this outline. Keep up the good work.

Someone blanked the page, which alerted me (via watchlist). While there, I noticed the outline was in a bit of a mess (using older formatting, etc.), so I've started cleaning it up by removing column formatting and by adding dashes in preparation for descriptive annotations. I also added some missing sections.

Please look it over. Feel free to fill any gaps you might find.

By the way, the following link is to a tool for searching Wikipedia titles. I thought you might find it useful. I like its streamlined title-only results, which are easily converted into list entries.

http://toolserver.org/~nikola/grep.php?lang=en&wiki=wikipedia&ns=0

I look forward to seeing your further improvements and additions to the outline.

Sincerely, The Transhumanist 21:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Talk pages

When you add new sections to article talk pages, please always add them at the bottom of the talk pages. This keeps them in a consistent order and makes it easier for new editors to know which discussions are current.

Also, as a side note, if you're proposing major changes to articles, you might want to remove the "Retired" banned from the top of this page :). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Physics

Please do not change the article again.
Let's ask Qwyrxian what he thinks of the changes.
Even if man used astrology, mythology and religion to understand the universe initially, this is a science article and you putting mythology back in is original research and POV.

Wikipedia has rules, I study mythology, spirituality and so on and am deeply interested in Oriental philosophy, mysticism = Siva, Taoism and so forth, but Wikipedia has rules, so I cannot say "the Universe spoke to me last night so incarnate intelligence exists", this is considered original research until it is backed up by verifiable sources.

Also, a sentence like: "For example, see atomism" is not correct English and not suitable for an encyclopaedia as a proper sentence, a sentence has a subject and a verb. You are obviously not a native English speaker, and this is nothing to hold against you, but for the moment, slow down, or you will find yourself being blocked for disruption. I am willing to help but you cannot equivocally make changes like you just did,[2], unlink perfectly good wikilinks and so on. It shows that you do not (fully) understand what you are doing. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 20:39, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Protein music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Protein music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protein music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 17:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Outline of science

I've been watching Outline of science, in anticipation of seeing your work upon it. Out of curiosity, in what ways do you plan on improving the outline? I look forward to seeing your improvements and additions. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 21:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

RfA

Hi Saeed. Are you still around? I have a small favour to ask you based on the graph you made that was featured in the Signpost last year. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)

You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 13:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sarı Gəlin Alihan Samedov.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sarı Gəlin Alihan Samedov.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarı Gəlin Alihan Samedov.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarı Gəlin Alihan Samedov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Saeed.Veradi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Saeed.Veradi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Sourcegraph

Hello, Saeed.Veradi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Taking Out The Trash, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sourcegraph, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sourcegraph.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Taking Out The Trash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)