P*h3i

P*h3i, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi P*h3i! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mario Kart Tour logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Kart Tour logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Image is now redundant in use. ~ P*h3i (📨) 21:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mario Tennis Aces logo (as appears in Nintendo Direct mini 1.11.2018).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Tennis Aces logo (as appears in Nintendo Direct mini 1.11.2018).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Image is now redundant in use. ~ P*h3i (📨) 21:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to join Wikiproject Video games

Hi P*h3i,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project Video games!. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

• You will see a list of articles that need most improvement .
• You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
• Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Video games, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Video games!

Feel free to put your name on the project member list. Hope you will have fun here, let us know if you need any help! Bobo.03 (talk) 20:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

@Bobo.03: Thanks. Glad to be part of the project. I really want to improve the coverage of Nintendo puzzle and rhythm games on Wikipedia. I've peer review nominated an article I hope to get to GA, Mario's Picross, and I was wondering how long it usually takes for a video games article to get responded to there? Thanks. ~ P*h3i (📨) 21:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

That's really great to know! I guess Thibbs who is an active member in the project can help you on that. Happy editing! Bobo.03 (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Bobo.03: Also, what did you mean about women's sport? ~ P*h3i (📨) 03:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, it's a typo.. Just fixed it. Bobo.03 (talk) 03:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

It's ok. I'll talk to Thibbs if the peer review nom stays up for a long time. Thanks. ~ P*h3i (📨) 03:40, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi P*h3i, I noticed that in your peer review you mentioned that you were worried that the reception might not be long enough. I can see that at WikiProject Video Games' Reference Library we have a review of the game under Issue #72 of Official Nintendo Magazine (See here). The contact person for that issue is User:Jaguar so he may be worth reaching out to ask for a copy of the review. In addition, at WP:VG/LRS we have a pretty good Reliable Source Custom Google search engine that can help you track down good sources covering a decent cross-section of international sources and vetted reliable sources. Please let me know if you need further help searching for coverage of reception for the game. I am fairly busy during the days, but I will try to keep track of your efforts at night, and on the weekends, and I'm glad to see that you know how to use the ping function so you should be able to reach me if you need additional help. Good luck reaching GA! -Thibbs (talk) 04:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Thibbs: Thanks very much! Although, I think you misread the peer review -- it's development I'm most worried about, although reception is something I plan to improve upon. In any case, thanks for the direction! ~ P*h3i (📨) 07:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

@Thibbs: I've put a message on their talk page, but it looks as if the account is retired, so I might not get a response. Any which way, I've found some use for the custom Google search, so thanks! ~ P*h3i (📨) 07:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For taking the time to give me mighty-fine GA reviews. Props. JOEBRO64 23:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: Haha, thank you very much. It was a pleasure reviewing them. ~ P*h3i (📨) 01:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario's Picross

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mario's Picross you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario's Picross

The article Mario's Picross you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mario's Picross for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze Edit Removal

Might it be OK if I asked why you felt like the information of the North American Wii U eShop removal warranted being removed? If it didn't belong in the lead, couldn't it at least be re-located? -AuraWielder

@AuraWielder: As per MoS, the lead is for core info. In addition, MoS also states all info in the lead should be expanded upon in the body. It would be better suited for Development and release but it's definitely not relevant or integral to the topic enough to be present in the lead paragraph. ~ P*h3i (📨) 00:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

So could we just re-locate it instead?

If you deem it necessary, although you must consider that when the Wii U eShop eventually gets discontinued (it's only a matter of time), the information will be irrelevant as no games will be available on it. ~ P*h3i (📨) 00:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Also, another note, please don't forget to sign your posts using four tildes. ~ P*h3i (📨) 00:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

About Sushi Striker

hey, so, about the page, Nintendo these days only have one division of internal development which is Nintendo EPD so if they put Nintendo as developer, it's about them. There's no other division to be credited now when Nintendo EAD and SPD are just one division as EPD unlike before where those two could be the developer so I don't understand this measure when they're crediting themselves along indieszero collaborating — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyohboy231 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

One thing we don't do on Wikipedia is assume things. Although it's pretty much 100% likely that EPD are developing it, that hasn't been officially announced -- only just "Nintendo". Wikipedia only writes what's been officially announced, so when it's actually announced that EPD is making it, we'll update it then. This is because statements like who's developing it need to be sourced. Thanks! ~ P*h3i (📨) 23:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mario's Picross

The article Mario's Picross you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mario's Picross for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WarioWare: Touched!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WarioWare: Touched! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 04:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

WarioWare: Touched

Hi there. I noticed you undid some of my edits to WarioWare: Touched!, so I came here to talk about them with you. I've merged some of our changes, but there are others which I'm not sure about. Specifically:

"...many reviewers were disappointed with its short length/brevity."

'Brevity' just means 'short length' - I think it's a better word in the context

Fine by me.

Minigames or mini-games?

The article on minigames is styled as one word, so I think it's a good idea to keep it consistent.

Plenty of other articles use "mini-game" over "minigame", and the article refers to it as being spelt a multitude of ways, not to mention that the article itself isn't exactly well-written or compliant with MoS. I went with "mini-game" because "minigame" is detected as a spelling error on my computer.

Utilizes/uses/featured "Twisted utilizes the Game Boy Advance SP's tilt sensors as a key game mechanic."

'Uses' is the jargon-free equivalent of 'utilizes', but I think features is a more precise term if it's a 'key game mechanic'. Also, since Twisted was published in the past, would it be better to use past tense?

I disagree with this, as when you say "features", it sounds like it is a key mechanic that is used but not the premise of the game. I believe "utilizes" is more representative of Twisted! as the motion detection is the whole focus of the game. By definition, "feature" means "a distinctive attribute of something", not "the focus of something". As for tense, it doesn't really matter when the game was published; as long as the game still exists we would use present tense. By your logic, all talk of media would be in past tense the second it is released.

Thanks in advance TeraTIX 10:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Anyway, thank you for your copyedit, you made a lot of improvements to the article. Also, please in future use colon-based replies on my talk page. Thanks! :) ~ P*h3i (📨) 11:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi again, I noticed User:TarkusAB has begun the GA review on WarioWare: Touched!. I acted on some recommendations, including adding exclamation marks after all instances of Touched, and changing mini-games to minigames. You reverted me, marked the edit as minor and included in your summary "You have made some errors." I think these changes were on reasonable grounds, and I'm not happy you reverted me with that kind of summary. TeraTIX 08:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

You also changed the array of paragraphs in the article's Gameplay section incorrectly and removed Controversy. Generally, the nominator of an article (me) is the one who makes the changes because all the major suggestions of a GAN need to be discussed and agreed by both the reviewer and the nominator upon before they are actually enacted. As the nominating party, I did not contribute an opinion at the time of your edits, and I could have disagreed with them. You're welcome to add to the review to suggest changes if you would like. Apologies for not giving a detailed summary, I wanted to start the review changes as quickly as possible. You've been a great help with the article and I didn't mean to offend. Thanks for understanding. ~ P*h3i (📨) 08:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

That's completely fine. Thanks for clarifying. TeraTIX 10:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WarioWare: Touched!

The article WarioWare: Touched! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WarioWare: Touched! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 00:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Gameplay of WarioWare, Inc..png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Score and Lives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WarioWare: Touched!

The article WarioWare: Touched! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WarioWare: Touched! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 10:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Congrats!

Good to see you got WarioWare: Touched! to GA status! Nice job TeraTIX 11:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much. ~ P*h3i (📨) 11:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, P*h3i. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Sound Bomber screenshot.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:WarioWare Inc screenshot Wario Whirled.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Picross S icon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Picross S icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Mario's TIme Machine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Mario's TIme Machine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)