AskYourselfWhy
Joined 9 May 2022
Comment edit
Thanks for your edit. But there is no need for you to link to Fridman's study in the intro when the rest of the sentence is sourcing the secondary sources at the end of the paragraph. This confuses the reader. Coverage of the study is already in the secondary sources, so citing a primary source there is confusing. Thanks. Zenomonoz (talk) 07:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, understood! AskYourselfWhy (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)