LostInReverence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am requesting to be considered to be unblocked. I understand what I did wrong and I take full responsibility and accountability for it, if unblocked I promise to not make disruptive edits again. I wanted to help contribute and be productive when it comes to editing Wikipedia pages and be productive and more informed before making edits to make sure that I am following the guidelines. I unintentionally made disruptive edits to pages in the past and it was years ago, but I promise not to continue this trend. In addition, I promise to and am retiring my additional account, DominatedBeast321, to follow Wikipedia guidelines. This is a lesson learned and an opportunity to grow. Thank you for your time and consideration.LostInReverence (talk) 11:51 pm, 9 October 2023, Monday (2 months, 31 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No evidence of block evasion recently. However, I'm not reviewing this unblock request. How vandalism can be "done out of good intentions" is a rather bizarre claim. --Yamla (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Yamla, Please clarify and expand on that. As for the claim, I mentioned disruptive edits, not vandalism. Please refer to the page Assume good faith when you get the chance. --LostInReverence 10:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please describe what you will not do more clearly, and please describe what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Unclear as to why we are here instead of original account. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)