Hello Kangaroopower! I'm looking over your script, and it looks great! Thanks! Technical 13 (talk) 15:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Technical 13! I'm happy you like it. Interestingly enough, although this was among the first 3 scripts (if not the first) that I coded on Wikipedia, it was one of the last to actually get working, so I'm glad it does what it needs to now! Best, --Kangaroopowah 01:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Kangaroopower, as a courtesy, I'm letting you know that I'm working on some improvements (mostly UI functionality and layout) to make it a little quicker to use this (not that it "really" needed it). Feel free to check out the improvements I am working on in my sandbox of your script (User:Technical 13/MRollback.js) and my UI testing on http://jsfiddle.net/ShoeMaker/NNMyt -- Happy editing Technical 13 (talk) 13:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Technical 13 I love the new UI but I'd appreciate it if you would agree to keeping the script at its current location in my user space, to make it easier for me to add non GUI features, keep the script working every time I make a breaking change to the flash library (coded by myself) that this script uses, and so we can have a central location for the script. Thanks, --Kangaroopowah 23:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have no problem with that request. I only made a duplicate in my space so I could add "reviewer" to the permissions list to test how it looked live. I don't currently have "rollbacker" but am on the final CVUA exam and ill be applying for rollbacker soon. :) Technical 13 (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks and good luck with your rollback request! (P.S. Use Igloo when you get rollback ;) --Kangaroopowah 06:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bug report 01-Sep-2013 edit

Please see: User talk:Arthur_Rubin#Help me; bot to revert all edits of an editor. I actually had same problem on my forked version, but figured it was something I did. I was going to work at debugging it, but don't have time for a few days, so if you have a moment to work on it first (probably be easier for you since you are obviously more familiar with your script), that would be great. :) Technical 13 (talk) 12:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I actually did see that. I'll look into it in a little bit. --Kangaroopowah 18:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Technical 13 it should be fixed! Thanks for alerting me to the bug (the only reason i saw it is because you linked my username in the conversation, and I got a notification). --Kangaroopowah 05:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

In Firefox, it is now blocked by NoScript due to include of User:Kangaroopower/Flash.js edit

Thank you for the script, it has been helpful in the past.
When attempting to use this script with Firefox and NoScript, it is blocked with the following issue:

[NoScript] Blocking nosniff Javascript served from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kangaroopower/Flash.js&action=raw&ctype=javascript with wrong type info text/x-wiki and included by https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kangaroopower/MRollback.js&action=edit&section=new

The "included by" is just the page that happens to be being viewed at the time.

This issue did not exist until the most recent change. It would be helpful if this could be resolved. Thanks. — Makyen (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply