User talk:JMF/Archives/2020/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Date formats
Please refrain from using purely numeric date formats on Wikipedia, as you did on Pound (currency). A date written as 01/02/03 means 1 February 2003 to a European, 2 January 2003 to an American or 3 February 2001 to a Japanese. Rather, use one of the date formats that is standard across Wikipedia: 24 May 2024 for articles on British/European topics, May 24, 2024 for articles on American topics, otherwise just keep it consistent throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers for more information on how to write dates in Wikipedia articles. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right of way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Rank insignia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rank insignia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Economic liberalism
why did you revert my edition to economic liberalism? Akg427 (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Akg427: because the text "Economic liberalism is a political and economic philosophy" has opened the article for a very long time and your insertion of the word 'ideology' was unexplained. The article ideology says "... more recent use treats the term as mainly condemnatory", which makes your edit wp:pov. That probably wasn't your intention but that is its effect. Second, the opening paragraph should summarise the main themes of the body, but nowhere is the concept of ideology raised there. So you would need to to a lot of background reading to find citations to support "ideology" rather than "philosophy". I hope that explains my terse edit note. If you are not satisfied, please use the article talk page to seek consensus for change. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)