Leave a message if you like, but be aware...

this user is working from dawn till dusk and can only drop in very occasionally these days.

The reply

edit

...is on my talk page. Have a good day! --DerRichter (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:WilliamKentKrueger1.jpg

edit

Press kit stuff isn't freely licensed at all; the copyright tag on that image: Template:CopyrightedFreeUse-Link is definitely inappropriate. If you want to use it, make sure he explicitly releases it under a free license that permits reuse and modification, including for commercial purposes - the Gnu Free Document License, the Free Art License and any Creative Commons License that doesn't include the noncommercial clause are all good. Get him to send a carbon copy of the email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org ;.

Anyways, in the meantime, it's been a while, so I'm closing that debate as delete - if you here back from him, harrass me and I'll undelete it, and maybe get the OTRS bit done quickly for you. Cheers, WilyD 13:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, while I'm still waiting for a reply from him there's not much I can do to change the situation. So it may be that people will never get to see what he looks like. Maybe it's not important. His books are classed as mysteries, why shouldn't his face be one, too?
But hey, while you're here, could you help? There's one thing I'm struggling with. I just don't understand why images offered in Press/Media Kits for free download and use are acceptable to everyone in all the various media but not to Wikipedia? It's the logic or legal implications I don't get. I've tried. I've read reams in WP about the copyright thing, but it doesn't really make it clear at all. I'm not arguing or looking for an argument. I'm really very law abiding and totally accept your decision. I'm just struggling to understand and you sound like someone who might know what you're talking about. So if you have a spare minute... in the meantime, perhaps I should draw a sketch! Burntfingers (talk) 07:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
So one of the goals of Wikipedia is to produce free content that can be reused downstream by other people, including for modification or sale. Press kit stuff is basically offered for use under unclear terms, and people retain the right to object, revoke or probably even sue if they're unhappy with the use, and we can't promise our reusers that they can freely us it. For instance, German Wikipedia recently partnered with one of the German dead tree encyclopaedia makers to produce a print version of Wikipedia (it just uses the introductory paragraphs), and many press kit makers might object to their press kit images being sold in a book like that, without getting any royalties.
In Wikipedia's early days, we did accept press kits photos and the like, but (and this was around the time I started editing, so take what I say with a grain of salt) we felt eventually that were were comprimising the free part too much for the encyclopaedia in "The Free Encyclopaedia" and that we were now in a position to demand freely licenced pictures; one thing that I do believe is that by not accepting limited (and unclear) use press kits photos and the like, we do "liberate" a lot of content. So guys, like User:AnonEMouse and User:Videmus Omnia have written requests for a lot of images and gotten positive responses, and I don't think they would have if we'd been using press kit stuff.
There may be other issues, but this is my understanding of the point. It does make a lot of people unhappy, but typically it's not that hard to dig up a photo or two freely licenced, although it's not trivial. A fair number of people don't understand it, and it's not like the policy is uniformly popular (in fact, the easiest way to become unpopular as an admin is to work a lot in image areas). Most people who're subjects of biographies want publicity and a little email that says "I need a freely licensed photo for Wikipedia ... perhaps you've heard of it?" goes a long way, especially since you can reassure people they'll retain "personality rights", and copyright for that matter, they're just agreeing to let people reprint it and not sue (and if the reusers violate personality rights, they can still sue). Cheers, WilyD 15:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for taking the time to explain! That helps put things into perspective. Burntfingers (talk) 19:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

See you later alligator...

edit

Cool, thanks for your note. Good luck with the project, I hope it goes well for you. Try to enjoy some of the summer though! Take it easy, The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008

edit

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 23:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members

edit
WikiProject Novels Roll Call
 

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 14:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008

edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 14:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

WikiProject France newsletter

edit
WikiProject France News

What's new?

edit
  •   The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
  • The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
  • A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
  • There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.
User-related news

Notifications

edit
Complete project tasks
Overview

This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Articles
  • Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews:
  1. Louvre Abu Dhabi
  2. Louvre
  3. Family Moving Day
  4. Napoleon I
  5. List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes
  •   Two articles have reached GA status this month:
Newsletter contributors

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 17:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Peter MayLogo1.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter MayLogo1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter May (writer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''[[Entry Island (novel)|Entry Island]]'' ([[Quercus]]) 2014)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Award (for crime novels), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

edit

Hi Burntfingers! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Userbox

edit

Hello. FYI, I've had a userbox created for me, and I thought it might be of interest since you were involved with the WikiProject Novels/Crime task force. It says "This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction" and the code to implement it is:

  This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction.

. (Add double braces to the red text: {{ }}). Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


Unfortunately, the code seems to have a typo, causing it to appear incorrectly. Here is the fixed code that you can copy and paste.
Wikitext userbox where used
{{User:KomradeKalashnikov/Userboxes/HB Detective Fiction}}
  This user reads Hard-boiled detective fiction.
linked pages

-- KomradeKalashnikov (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply