Hurryback121

January 2009

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurryback121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

An indefinite block for offering advice? Please, will an impartial user please examine this case? This user is obviously fulfilling the prophecy I predicted about him. This is now way for Wikipedia to behave. Hold on a minute, who the hell am I supposed to be? Where is the evidence for calling me a 'sock' of some other user? This is my first time using a wikipedia account.

Decline reason:

"You are a drag on humanity". Even if you are not a sock (which you are), that first edit is enough to tell us your intentions here. — Smashville^talk 13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is your first time using a Wikipedia account, could you please explain your first edit? Seems like a very unusual way to get started... – Luna Santin (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I follow certain articles on Wikipedia which Schumin recently interfered with. I don't edit here other than very occasionally in an IP situation. I decided to quickly create an account and raise what I feel is an unacceptable disregard for common manners and protocal by a use who appears to have nerdish aspirations of 'wiki-prestige'. Wikipedia is too important to be overcome by users with no vision of the future, or of how great this place can and should be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.73.180 (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)