Welcome!

edit

Hello, Morning Sunshine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! œ 11:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:2011 Ice Dogs.jpg and File:Iron Range Ironheads vs Flyers.png

edit

I asked the author of these photos for permission months ago, he gave permission for a commons license... I even then added the conversation to the permission... I now have had him e-mail your OTRS or whatever... he sent an e-mail on the fourth... but yet the Iron Range photo is still up for deletion on the 10th... and now you've thrown a tag on the Ice Dogs photo... as far as I can tell, I've already shown my due diligence in proving to you guys that I didn't somehow steal these photos... could you please rectify this situation, because I cannot due much more here. DMighton (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. If you have valid permission from the author/copyright holder attached in the email, please send it to OTRS and any volunteers (or me) can help you (note that the address for permission queue on en.wiki is permissions-en@wikimedia.org). Or you can request for help here. Thanks--Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

He e-mailed the Permissions e-mail on the 4th. DMighton (talk) 02:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Warbird picture from Astonishing X-Men!

edit

Picture was uploaded from the comic book cover Astonishing X-Men # 48 (2012), The comic book was purchased by me making me the owner of the comic and the owner of the scanner. Even though it is a marvel character it becomes open access since being purchased and widely available. Gijimu (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, you owns the book when you purchase it but you can't own the copyright of its content by that way. The license cc-by-sa on this image is totally wrong. I think this image can't be stored here if it isn't tagged with {{non-free comic}}. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well if you can let me know how I can get a photo up of her that will be acceptable under wiki policy any help would be appreciated. Gijimu (talk) 22:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Morning Sunshine. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 13:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Stefan2 (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Girls' Generation

edit

Hi Morning Sunshine, I opened a GA review for Girls' Generation. While it is a very interesting article with a lot of information, it would take a lot of work to bring it up to the GA criteria (WP:WIAGA). I left a few general comments on the review page. I can leave the review open for a week if you like, but honestly, you might want to withdraw the nomination and work on it for a while before trying again. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your comments. I think I'd better withdraw it. How can I do that. I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm very grateful if you can help me here. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ok, there's nothing you need to do, I can just close it. For future reference, Peer Review is a very good place to get advice on articles before nominations. There's a bit of a wait, but they're usually very helpful. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:EXO (band) albums)

edit

I have moved your CFD nominations to the "speedy" section. The removal of the stray parenthesis is completely a non-controversial fix. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. I didn't notice this--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:46, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for !voting

edit
  at my successful RFA
Thank you, Morning Sunshine, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. (Good luck with Girls' Generation, btw) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Bascially what you were saying, I would have to ask permission from the copyright holder in order to upload it instead of just stating where the source came from? Or is it a bit different (I don't have the greatest understanding of copyright). --Thenewguy34 (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Did I seriously just ask that? Man, I'm going to lose my mind by the end of the week. --Thenewguy34 (talk) 09:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your request for rollback

edit
 

Hi Morning Sunshine. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - TP 13:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Govt.High School Pakkay Wala Jhang

edit

Hi! Just to let you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Govt.High School Pakkay Wala Jhang as schools are not elegible for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. If you still believe it should be deleted, I would suggest WP:PROD or WP:AFD. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! Coming... 09:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I'm sorry I don't notice that. I think I should read CSD policy more carefully. Thank you very much. Regards Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can you please explain to me why you reverted my edits to the Dusan Ivkovic article?

edit

Can you please tell my edits to this article - Dusan Ivkovic were reverted? Did I break a site rule?173.216.233.111 (talk) 01:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. As your edit has been tagged for violating Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, I think it should be reverted. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. Thank you--Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Can you please tell me what is controversial about adding a basketball biography info box to an article. And why I was tagged for violating rules?173.216.233.111 (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Biography of living person must have a proper source or reference to verify. You must cite a reliable source to prove that your information is true. You may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners if you don't know how to do. Good luck Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The infobox only summarises the information already in the article, it doesn't add any new information, so I've put it back. The article itself could do with a source for his date of birth and his career as a player - I don't read Serbian, but it may be in one of the Serb language sources. I can't see it in either of the two Euroleague sources. His coaching career is sourced to the main Euroleague entry. Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reverting edits

edit

Please see: WP:DEPROD. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Photo source

edit

I traveled to Cuc Phuong Primate Rehab center with Dieter Roggy and he took the photo File:800px-Cuc.Phuong.Primate.Rehab.center.jpg. He doesn't edit wikipedia, so uploaded the file with his permission. What do I need to do to prevent the photo from being deleted? David Straub (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Sorry for the delayed answer. What you need to do is contacting the author via email and telling him to release the image under the license on image page (this is important, the permission will not be accepted without relevant license) and sending to the address I had stated in the conversation with DMighton on the top of this page. You may want to read this too. Good luck --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply. I just sent my friend an email and asked him to send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. It might take him a few days to respond, so please be patient. Thanks.David Straub (talk) 00:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Dieter Roggy just sent an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. He also included permission for the following photo: [1]. Please keep me informed. David Straub (talk) 04:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I just noticed that the photo was deleted. Was the email Dieter Roggy sent ever received at permissions-en@wikimedia.org? Is there someone else I should ask about this?David Straub (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

For some awesome work tonight!

♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
No vandal is safe from your eye <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
My pleasure. Thank you very much--Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sharon Needles

edit

The info you blanked looks well-sourced and policy-compliant to me. If you think it doesn't belong, it may be a good idea to engage with the IP either at the article's talk page, or at his/her own. Cheers! Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 03:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mutter7777

edit

Hi, thanks for fixing my talk page. That particular user was making joke edits to Wikipedia yesterday, and I warned him/her twice. S/he also vandalized my talk page once after you warned him. FYI... Roodog2k (talk) 16:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

AN/I and the IP troll

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 02:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your notice. I have left my comment there. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
  Thank you for removing incorrect warning templates from my talk page!  TOW  talk  04:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. Keep on good work as a vandalism fighter. Best regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
  Enjoy ;) Thank you for offering to nominate me for adminship, but I don't feel ready...yet... →Bmusician 05:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

RfA vote

edit

Hi Morning Sunshine. Bmusician chose to indent the oppose !vote himself in this edit, I assume because he changed his mind. WormTT(talk) 15:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, I don't notice that--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem, it's an easy mistake to make! I'll drop Bmusician a note suggesting he strike it, to avoid confusion, and possibly vote somewhere else! WormTT(talk) 15:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Email

edit
  • Hi MS, I received your email. For most communications on Wikipedia it is preferred that we use the user's talk page. Regarding adoption, I say welcome aboard if you want it.
Regarding language use, yours is pretty good but requires copyediting before getting to a GA level (or FA). For general article creation, it's sufficient. As you said, working on Vietnamese actors or singers is certainly a good idea. Many are in poor shape. I work in the same general area (Mostly Indonesian though) and it is generally a fun topic to write about. Assuming you are in the country, you have access to sources that many people don't, such as Vietnamese-language books. It's fine to use foreign-language and offline sources; if it weren't, Chrisye would be stuck a stub.
As for K-Pop, my students love it. I am neutral on the matter, although I must admit the songs are catchy. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your helpful answer. I prefer to be adopted. But how can I do that now?--Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

K-pop RMs

edit

There are other active mononym vs. full name K-pop RMs, you know: Talk:Lee_Junho#Requested_move, Talk:Jang_Wooyoung#Requested_move, and Talk:Sooyoung#Requested move: Sooyoung → Choi Soo-young. Kauffner (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

edit

Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagalejo^^^ 05:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations. Keep on good work as an administrator. Best regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:02, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

My left ball

edit

Hiya Morning Sunshine; thanks for your CSD work! CSD G1 applies when an article consists entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It includes gibberish created by banging the keyboard, and everything that is basically incoherent. It does not include anything else - even silly statements, vandalism and hoaxes, and poorly written English! I'll give you an example of what is G1 and an example of what is not G1.

This is G1

asdfjasdfkasjdfksadjfalsfjslkafjksdlafjsadlfjsdalfjsadflsjdflsafjsadfjsdfjsadjfbmnvbzxnmvbmnvbzvxzvx

This isn't

Hamburger are delicious. It consist of cooked patty of ground meat usually place inside a sliced bread roll

Regards, →Bmusician 10:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I know it. Thank you very much for your instruction--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Redirects

edit

You don't need to move pages to make redirects.—Ryulong (竜龙) 05:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kim Jong-un

edit

The person in flickr has uploaded it in CC-BY-SA. You can view the flickr link in the file info. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

The problem of this image is not about the license. It's that the flickr uploader may not be the photographer therefore has no rights to release it under free permission (see the link of higher resolution version on other website I have pointed there)--Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Aseanmotor

edit

I blocked him indef. Thanks for the clarification. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ryan Wesley Smith

edit

What can I do to the Ryan Wesley Smith page to not get it deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamingofcreativity (talkcontribs) 03:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikipedia:Notability. i think being known only on social network like Twitter and Youtube is not relevant to create an article here o Wikipedia.--Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Darazs Productions

edit

Please Email me A copy of the page. OldSnake1911 (talk) 04:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)OldSnake1911OldSnake1911 (talk) 04:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by that--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

A copy of everything on the page before its deleted!! Another Question How do I make a Category Box like the one on your page ???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldSnake1911 (talkcontribs) 04:24, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

A pie for you!

edit
  Diligent work in multiple areas of Wikipedia. CTS talk 11:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, my pleasure--Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Deletion

edit

Hi Morning_Sunshine, just wanted to stop by and suggest you review WP:Before. I saw your nomination of Coldside (Music) at AfD even though it qualifies for CSD under two separate categories, A7 for musicians & bands and G11 for unambiguous advertising. It's always best to tag for speedy deletion or propose deletion if an article qualifies for either of those -- think of AfD is a step up from those two. Keep up the great editing! --IShadowed 18:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your advice--Morning Sunshine (talk) 01:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Hello! I know you are a legitimate Wikipedia user but could you please approve my recent changes for Emily Blunt's profile. Please? I'm such a huge fan and I just updated her movies,awards,etc.


Tonylennox (talk) 08:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

No problem. It's just that you need to provide your reason for removing content in edit summary box so that everyone could understand your intention. Good luck--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Udayar (caste)

edit

I suggest WP:DENY, the IP will be blocked soon enough and until then they can have the article they way they want it. As soon as their blocked we can revert without needing to worry about clogging up the page history. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for your advice. Best regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
I asked User:JamesBWatson to block the IP which seems to have worked. Regarding your page protection request I've suggested that the page isn't protected as there is only one IP vandalising the page. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Geologica-acta

edit

The article doesn't seem to have a blatant ad tone. (as it doesn't tell people to apply for anything). I instead put an {{advert}} as well as {{norefs}} and {{notability}} set of templates on it. --wL<speak·check> 09:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks for letting me know. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

UAA

edit

Hey, Morning Sunshine, I see you've been doing some work reporting usernames at UAA. I just wanted to remark that I find the admins appreciate it when we provide them links to the problematic edits that a user has made when reporting them. I see the "Wait until the user edits" used a lot, so leaving them a link so they can quickly see for themselves can save them a bit of time. Thanks! Writ Keeper 04:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your help. I'll keep this in mind. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fly kite united

edit

Replaced content of this page with g7 as the author of the page had blanked it. Vrenator talk 15:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for letting me know--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: July 2012

edit

Re: Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gold Peak, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

The contents on the page of [Peak] are out-of-date. Lighthouse Technologies was no longer subsidary nor associate of Gold Peak since 2009. Please refer to the announcement published on the website of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited for investors' information. It is essential to remove the out-of-date contents from wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonniephk (talkcontribs) 06:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rochester, Kent

edit

Thanks for dealing with the IP vandal, you beat me to it by the proverbial knat's whisker. I have logged a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some bubble tea for you!

edit
  For beating me to reverting vandalism. Vincent Liu (something to say?) 03:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you--Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


National Grand Lodge

edit

It's been deleted as a copyright violation, it's also promotional and POV. Any particular reason you wanted me to take a look? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nothing special. I just wanted you to delete it but Sphilbrick has done it. Anyway, thank you for your time. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:AIV report/cleanup

edit

I blocked a user in response to your report, but I don't know enough about the articles he edited recently to know if there are any viable ones there (and might be shared/dynamic IP?).

Could you take a look and revert as necessary? DMacks (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done Sorry, I didn't notice this. I have reverted all the vandalism by that anon. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! (and thanks in general for your vandalism-patrolling). DMacks (talk) 15:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please tag pages for speedty deletion correctly

edit

Hi,

Thanks for nominating Russell Roberts Newman College for speedy deletion. Unfortunately, because you marked it for speedy under notability (A7), the article was not deleted immediately. As the article was clearly an attack page, the template you should have used was {{db-attack}}. Attack pages are dealt with immediately, whereas notability pages are usually reviewed by passing administrators on a more "as and when" basis.

For a full list of templates for speedy deletion and the categories they are used with, please see WP:CSD. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! Coming... 09:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have already known {{db-attack}} template. However, I didn't notice that it's an attack page. Anyway, thank you for letting me know this--Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Not meaning to be too critical, but the question I have to ask you is why are you tagging articles for deletion if you aren't reading them? If you aren't reading them for content then you won't know if they are valid candidates for speedy deletion. The criteria for notability is very narrow, and does not always apply to short articles. When I originally went to open the article, I was expecting to decline it for speedy deletion, as the title implied it was the name of a school, which cannot be speedily deleted for notability.
As an absolute minimum, before tagging an article for speedy deletion, you need to (a) Be fully aware of the criteria for speedy deletion; (b) Read the article fully, and check any links and references; (b) Check the page history, in case there are earlier versions that are acceptable, and also to see if it has been declined before; (d) Check the talk page for any further information.
Tagging articles without checking them first make extra work for the administrators. More importantly, incorrectly tagging an article by a new contributor can put them off staying with the project, and we lose a potentially great contributor.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! Coming... 11:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
There are things that ring a bell with experienced editors who are on 'patrol watch' when an enthusiastic user may be needing some help, so I've been checking through your maintenance work. While every effort by users to maintain the standard of articles is appreciated, and very necessary of course, I feel that perhaps you might wish to take a break from semi admin areas until you are more familiar with policies and guidelines. Page patrolling may seem easy at the outset, but to be done properly, it needs a near-admin knowledge of policies and procedures. For your work on NPP, I thoroughly recommend that you take time off to read WP:N, WP:NPP, WP:CSD, and WP:AfD. Plenty of help is available, so if you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm always wary when I come across new users who begin their editing career in meta areas (such NPP, AfD, AIV, ANI, RfA, RfB, etc). It's generally assumed that users who work in those areas will have a very good knowledge of policies and guidelines, and will have consigned the criteria for deletion to memory. I can't see what the interest is in joining an encyclopedia project with out first making substantial contributions to content or creating new articles, because doing so builds not only the articles we need, but also builds a new user's knowledge of how things work here. There's no other advice I can really give you other than to do that, while at the same time reading and learning the pages I linked you to. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zack Martin.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Zack Martin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mail

edit

Replied. TheSpecialUser TSU 14:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Thank you for participating in my RfA. I appreciate that you took the time to comment and I hope I'll continue to see your name pop up around Wikipedia.

Take care. =) Kurtis (talk) 15:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rehearsal_2012.jpg

edit

Hi Morning Sunshine, Thanks for your time in reviewing photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rehearsal_2012.jpg that I uploaded. I forwarded the owner's permission but that seems not to be enough. The owner will send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.orgstating that those can be used freely and without limitations. Regards Serbian folklore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serbian folklore (talkcontribs) 14:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delayed answer, seem to have been   Done by Sphilbrick--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

reverts

edit

Hi. It obviously wasn't vandalism, and you did revert yourself, but I'm just curious to know what happened here. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk 22:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sincerely sorry for that. Reviewer request page is in my watchlist. My mouse wasn't working properly and I clicked rollback acidentally when checking the list yesterday. So it's just a mistake, however, I will be more careful next time. Regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Little Audrey

edit

I noticed there is a content dispute on Little Audrey. Could you help by getting a discussion started on the article talk page? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Moon Embracing the Sun poster.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:The Moon Embracing the Sun poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Similar names

edit

Hi, do you know of any others? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I understand your diff. I know two other example: Nguyễn Du and Nguyễn Dữ. Nguyễn Bình and Nguyễn Bính--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks I should have remember Nguyễn Du's near-homonym as I worked on the "strange tales" article. As for Nguyễn Bình ‎and Nguyễn Bính I hadn't heard of the poet, I added new brief bios for both of them. Very helpful. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Poseidonposter-korean2.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Poseidonposter-korean2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Photo of Kia Silverbrook 2012.jpg‎

edit

Is this now a clean candidate for moving to Commons based on the permissions granted at OTRS? And can you confirm the CC license type and version? --Lexein (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The file is OK now, but I will fix the license, it's cc-by-sa-3.0 not 1.0. Thank you--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you - such changes are best coming from OTRS agents. --Lexein (talk) 03:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:London Tipton.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:London Tipton.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Morning Sunshine. You have new messages at Riley Huntley's talk page.
Message added 02:11, 13 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

-- Cheers, Riley 02:11, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

POTD notification

edit
 
POTD

Hi Hoang,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Panorama La Défense.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 26, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-01-26. howcheng {chat} 17:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/INeverCry

edit

I/Rschen7754 have removed the nomination from WP:RfA because the candidate has not accepted the nomination yet. I have also restored the request page to stop the "timer" for the same reason. Just FYI.   The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 06:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I has told INC about this RfA as I mention there--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
OK. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 06:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hi Morning Sunshine. I've filled everything out. INeverCry 07:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Good Luck Charlie - logo.PNG)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Good Luck Charlie - logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you!

edit
  I just wanted to give you a quick thanks for the RFA, which went quite well. INeverCry 03:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your kindness. I'm sorry for not congratulating you. In fact, I rarely congratulate somebody both here and in my real life. My friend say I'm a cold man :-)--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
That makes your choice of username a bit ironic.   INeverCry 05:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Anyway, I'm ẹnoying the Lunar New Year holiday. If you have a chance to come to Vietnam in late January or early February (or if you have already known the Lunar Calendar, it is from 29 December to 3 January), you will know how exciting it is--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Morning Sunshine. You have new messages at Riley Huntley's talk page.
Message added 01:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Sorry for the late reply. -- Cheers, Riley 01:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sexy Love cover.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Sexy Love cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Michaela den (talk) 12:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Zack Martin.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Zack Martin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 12:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Jumong poster.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jumong poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Morning Sunshine. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Morning Sunshine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Dong Yi.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dong Yi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply