User talk:FR30799386/undo.js

Interface-protected edit request on 19 July 2019 edit

The original script creator is now blocked on en-wiki for sockpuppeting. But some user still has this script imported in their common.js or minerva.js. This script is outdated so please replace the codes with this following code. I have the original creator's permission. Thanks.

//  mobileUndo 2.0.0, a script allowing reversion of edits on mobile.
//  All code is released under the default Wikipedia content license.
//  Installation instructions at [[User:FR30799386/undo]].
// This script is located on meta [[meta:User:FR30799386/undo.js]]
mw.loader.load('//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:FR30799386/undo.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');

Masum Reza📞 16:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy ping Bbb23 Masum Reza📞 17:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Not done @Masumrezarock100 and Bbb23: nope, we are not going to proxy edits for a blocked user to another project - if people want to load from another project they should change their scripts. — xaosflux Talk 17:38, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Xaosflux: Can't you at least copy-paste the script? If it contains any code that harms an user account, don't do it then. Masum Reza📞 17:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Masumrezarock100: please see Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Proxying. Feel free to contact the very few people that have linked to this, they can change to use the remote page if they want to. Additionally, by changing it to a remote load, future code changes could be introduced via this blocked account's script that would impact local users. — xaosflux Talk 17:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Xaosflux:I am not talking about future codes. I am requesting you to copy the code from meta and paste it here since you are an independent edior if you find that content productive. Changes they made to this script were suggested by MusikAnimal (WMF). Masum Reza📞 17:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Masumrezarock100: Still declining, this user is blocked for policy violations - other editors here should have reason to be wary of trusting scripts from policy blocked users. That a foundation employee suggested technical improvements to a script on meta-wiki has nothing to do with this. It is trivial for people to remote-load this if they really want to (and there are so few of them). If this is going to be widely used here on enwiki, it can be proposed as a gadget, or a new maintainer could fork it. If you would like to escalate this, please open a discussion at WP:IANB and reference this discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 18:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Fine. I won't post it on WP:IANB. Masum Reza📞 18:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply