Thank you for your contributions!

edit
  Hello Dr. Wyspa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'd like to personally thank you for your recent contributions to Ryu Hayabusa. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. If you want to learn more about the project, I recommend reading Wikipedia:Introduction (it's short and easy to go through!). I'd like to invite you to check out WikiProject Video games, which has information for people that like to edit video game articles. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page and again, welcome! Odie5533 (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sock puppet

edit

(In response to email; electing to post response here for transparency purposes.)

HanzoHattori,

You are banned from editing Wikipedia, end of question. That remains in effect.

You may request on your talk page to a review of it from your main account (preferably via an unblock request), and the community can discuss it on one of the administrators' noticeboards.

Until that happens, you still remain banned from Wikipedia, and any edits from you may be reverted on sight.

If you can help yourself from staying away from the site in the meantime, then I strongly recommend that you seek psychiatric help. Regards, –MuZemike 23:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Answer

edit

The "seek psychiatric help" comment was just uncalled for. Seriously. "For transparency purpose" you chose to demean me like that.

In case if you meant this: no, I don't think I am actually Harry Buttle, or any other character. I'm not an otherkin or anything, it was just a metaphore. The rest is just my problem that I don't share randomly with the Internet and certainly don't need any strangers to publicily remark on (if it was even a good-intended comment).

If you wanted to just show me your contempt, maybe because I care for Wikipedia way too much - good job, I bet you're such a cool guy and not a loser like me.

Oh and actually I meant Harry Tuttle, Harry Buttle was the guy that got mistaken for him by the government: Brazil (film) - not that it changes much, I just correct myself. (And again, it was just a metaphore.)

And also regarding public requests - if it means dealing with people like you, given your unprovoked attitude towards me, I think I'll pass on it, and will just avoid bureaucracy from far away, or totally any contact with anyone here whatsover (unfortunately it was a mistake that I tried to play by rules, which is pretty sad). Especially since I don't think it would work, anyway (for some reason). Or at least that's how I feel right now, maybe it would change, I don't know. --Dr. Wyspa (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

"unfortunately it was a mistake that I tried to play by rules". Played by what rules? Not Wikipedia's rules, which say banned editors cannot edit.--Atlan (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know, I can't help myself when I see I could improve something somewhere (except of non-fiction, I became tired of the serious stuff). I meant reporting the other guy's repeated intentionally obstructive edits, instead of just edit warring (or calling him names or whatever). That was, like, a right thing - in theory. In a hindsight, I should have left this strange guy alone, he wasn't really harmful after all, my bad. --Dr. Wyspa (talk) 07:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you actually "care for Wikipedia way too much" (as I also do), you need to work within the rules... and socking is a blatant violation of the rules. And edit warring is not only against the rules, it's futile. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots11:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply