User talk:Michael-Moates/sandbox/Michael Moates

A list of what I changed:

edit

What about this article needs to be done to address promotional concerns? DoctorTexan (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Remove journalism stories about the organization but not related to Moates
  • Removed all Twitter links about external figure... too flashy seemed narcissistic
  • Removed comment about Moates parents per not public figure
  • Removed comments about who published Moates, added to the lede that he was a contributor
  • Removed unrelated mentions of journalism org that didn't relate to Moates
  • Removed most social media including youtube links
  • Removed nearly 3/4 the sources from things near him but that he was not directly involved.
  • Removed not needed Linked in page for co founder.
  • Removed AYIP founder name per not public figure
  • Changed list of news sources under AOC section to say mainstream media with one citation
  • Removed complicated language like 501(c)3
  • Removed the long list of Times organizations

For notability purposes here are the reference I am using to meet the requirements. I had a MAJOR realization I was using the article to try to show notability which made it look messy, spammy, and promotional... I hope this looks better. WP:ARTN was huge for me.

@Praxidicae: - I believe I have satisfied your promotional concern. See above and the article... would love your feedback.

@Deb: - I believe I have settled your notability questions see below and on my talk page.

I worked really hard to clean up this article so I hope you guys like it better.

See: Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals (I am directly cited) - Policy says: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.

See: Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline (Political coverage of me or my campaign) - Policy says: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,and independent of the subject.

See: Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline (I am a subject in the article) - Policy says: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,and independent of the subject.

DoctorTexan (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply