Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.clementscenter.org/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.clementscenter.org/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (tJosve05a (c) 17:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Regarding your question about the logo of the Clements Center: There are copyright issues, and various possible solutions depending on the logo's copyright status. I saw that the "content of www.clementscenter.org" has been released under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License; does that include the logo? If so, you can upload it to the Wikimedia Commons via their Upload Wizard.

If the logo is not meant to be freely licensed, things get a little trickier. Wikipedia (unlike the Commons, which is for free images only) allows the use of some non-free content under the doctrine of "fair use", but there are severe restrictions lined out in the non-free content criteria. The good news is that the use of an organization's logo as the primary means of visual identification in an infobox is permissible. The bad news is that non-free images may only be used in live articles; a draft is not enough. Thus you'd have to wait with uploading the logo until the draft has been accepted. The Wikipedia upload link is WP:File Upload Wizard, and you'll have to fill out a specific fair use template explaining why the proposed use is indeed "fair".

It might also be possible that the logo isn't copyrightable in the first place because it doesn't meet the threshold of originality; however, this seems a somewhat borderline case and I don't feel comfortable to make that judgement call. If the Clements Center is of the opinion that the logo can't be copyrighted, the Commons would again be the place to upload it; the relevant copyright template you'd have to use for the Upload Wizard is {{PD-textlogo}} (including the curly brackets).

On an entirely unrelated note, your draft doesn't cite any reliable sources that are independent of the center, such as articles about it published by newspapers or reputable magazines. We need such sources both to allow our readers to verify the content and to establish that the center is notable enough for an article in the first place. Huon (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Clementscenter. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft

edit
 

Hello, Clementscenter. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "William P. Clements".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:William P. Clements, Jr. Center for History, Strategy & Statecraft}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply