Bluelemon2324243

July 2024

Hello, I'm Frost. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Forward caste seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frost 14:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey,

You reverted back to another article which was equally biased towards the brahmanical hegemony and it contained article about scheduled caste and tribes even though the article is about forward caste.

I have edited to make it neutral as I agree I got carried away in the last paragraph. Read other paras and you can see how it is written by some brahmin apologist, even the page in 2012 written was less biased. They article showed how brahmins are the real victim of all this even though the history of Casteism goes back to birth of Jesus Christ. Bluelemon2324243 (talk) 14:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Forward caste. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 14:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

You have reverted my edits back to another biased article.

This is emotionally charged topic. I would be happy if the article was removed or made by someone with clear authority and unbiasedness .

Are you Indian? No. Then why are you reverting my article for some internet browny points. How is Forward Caste description in previous article better than my description. Don't just revert it tell me how that article is neutral? Bluelemon2324243 (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a platform to right great wrongs. While I do agree that additional historical context is needed in the article, I must say that adding polemical and unsourced/poorly sourced content is not the right way for that. You should cite reliable sources such as high-quality journal papers and books written by researchers and historians for that. JavaHurricane 09:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hinduismiscancer per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hinduismiscancer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)