Regarding on Draft:Doors (Roblox game) edit

@TheTechie, this is CSM, an AFC patroller. Just for clarity, I was reviewing the article and found that you had denied twice. From my perspective, the user is failing to address the issues you said on comments. Also he was adding few sources, still not making upto the mark on qualifying this article. I have one question. Is social media (YT, X (twitter), etc.) may not fill the criteria? ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️✉️📔) 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, @CSMention269,
Yes, Twitter and FB, etc. are considered self published sources, so you cannot count them as reliable. If they keep ignoring the AFC comments, feel free to reject the draft, meaning that they cannot resubmit it further (assuming you are an AFC reviewer and have AFC helper, you can just use the decline option, select "reject", then select the option that says "subject is not notable". It'll post a message saying "this subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia".) Feel free to reply with any more questions and thanks for patrolling.
Best, thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanx ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️✉️📔) 11:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

iPad Pro Display Citation. edit

Hello there, I wanted to use "apple.com" as my citation but I was worried its a broad web page and doesn't cover only the iPad, even in the iPad subsection... By the way, what are canned edit summaries? Dulton100 (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply