User:Joshua Jonathan/Asian Modernisation and Religion


This a start for a article on the mutual influence since the 19th century between western colonialism, orientalism and Indology, Asian responses as reflected in Asian (social) reform movements, nationalism and the modernisation of Hinduism and Buddhism, and the influence of those developments on western modern spirituality and academic thought.

Since the late 18th century, an intensive exchange of cultural and religious ideas has been taking place between Asian and western cultures, changing and shaping both cultural hemispheres.[1][2][3][4][5]

Asian religions edit

 
Distribution of Eastern religions (yellow), as opposed to Abrahamic religions (purple).

Classification edit

Eastern religions refers to religions originating in the Eastern worldIndia, China, Japan and Southeast Asia—and thus having dissimilarities with Western religions. This includes the Indian and East Asian religious traditions, as well as animistic indigenous religions.

This East-West religious distinction, just as with the East-West culture distinction, and the implications that arise from it, are broad and not precise. Furthermore, the geographical distinction has less meaning in the current context of global transculturation.

While many Western observers attempt to distinguish between Eastern philosophies and religions, this is a distinction that does not exist in some Eastern traditions.[6]

Indian religions edit

According to Adams, Indian religions

[include] early Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, and Sikhism, and sometimes also Theravāda Buddhism and the Hindu- and Buddhist-inspired religions of South and Southeast Asia.[web 1]

Far Eastern religions edit

According to Adams, Far Eastern religions

[comprise] the religious communities of China, Japan, and Korea, and consisting of Confucianism, Taoism, Mahāyāna (“Greater Vehicle”) Buddhism, and Shintō.[web 1]

Modernisation edit

 
Modern machine

Modernisation refers to a model of an evolutionary transition from a 'pre-modern' or 'traditional' to a 'modern' society. The teleology of modernization is described in social evolutionism theories, existing as a template that has been generally followed by societies that have achieved modernity.[7][8] While it may theoretically be possible for some societies to make the transition in entirely different ways, there have been no counterexamples provided by reliable sources.

Historians link modernization to the processes of urbanization and industrialisation, as well as to the spread of education. As Kendall notes, "Urbanization accompanied modernization and the rapid process of industrialization."[9] In sociological critical theory, modernization is linked to an overarching process of rationalisation. When modernization increases within a society, the individual becomes that much more important, eventually replacing the family or community as the fundamental unit of society.[web 2]

Western expansion edit

Sea travel and exploration edit

Colonialisation of South-East Asia edit

India edit

Sri Lanka edit

Thailand edit

Birma edit

Japan edit

Western interest in Asian religions edit

Indology and Hindu studies edit

The study of India and its cultures and religions has been shaped by the interests of colonialism and western notions of religion.[10][11] Since the 1990's, those influences and it's outcomes have been the topic of debate among scholars of Hinduism[10][note 1] , and have also been taken over by critics of the western view on India.[12][note 2]

The creation of "Hinduism" edit

Sweetman identifies several areas in which "there is substantial, if nor universal, agreement that colonialism influenced the study of Hinduism":[13]

  1. The establishment of a textual basis for Hinduism by European Orientalists, akin to the Protestant culture.[13] This establishment was also driven by the preference of the colonial powers for written authority rather than oral authority.[13]
  2. The influence of Brahmins on European constructions of Hinduism.[13] Colonialism has been a significant factor in the reinforcement of the Brahmana castes, and the "brahmanisation"[14] of Hindu society.[14] The Brahmana castes preserved the texts which were studied by Europeans, and provided access to them. The authority of those texts was enlarged by the study of those texts by Europeans.[13] Brahmins and Europeans scholars shared a similar perspective in the perception of "a general decline from an originally pure religion".[13]
  3. The identification of Vedanta, and specifically Advaita Vedanta, as the "paradigmatic example of the mystical nature of the Hindu religion"[13][note 3] and the "central philosophy of the Hindus".[13] Several factors aided in favouring Advaita Vedanta:[15]
    1. Fear of French influence, especially the impact of the French Revolution; the hope was that "the supposed quietist and consrvative nature of Vedantic thought would prevent the development of revolutionary sentiment;[16]
    2. "The predominance of Idealism in nineteenth century European philosophy";[17]
    3. "The amenability of Vedantic thought to both Christian and Hindu critics of 'idolatry' in other formsd of Hinduism".[17]
  4. The European construction of caste, which denied former political configurations, and insisted upon an "essentially religious character" of India.[18] During the colonial period, caste was represented as a religious system, and divorced from political powers.[17] This made it possible for the colonial rulers to portray India as a society characterised by spiritual harmony, but to portray the former Indian states as "despotic and epiphenomenal"[17], with the colonial powers providing the necessary "benevolent, paternalistic rule by a more 'advanced' nation".[17] It also contributed to the significant role of religion in the Indian freedom struggle, since religion was the area to which indian powers were confined.[citation needed]
  5. The construction of 'Hinduism' in the image of Christianity[19], as "a systematic, confessional, all-embracing religious entity".[19] Several forces played a role in this construction:
    1. The European scholarship which studied India,[19]
    2. The "acts of policy of the colonial state",[19]
    3. Anti-colonial Hindus[20] "looking toward the systematization of disparate practices as a means of recovering a precolonial, antional identity".[19][note 4]

Early translations edit

European missionaries were active in India since the early 1700's, for example Bartholomäus Ziegenbalg, who translated Christian texts into Tamil, but also collected tamil texts, and translated several of them.[10] In 1785 appeared the first western translation of a Sanskrit-text.[11][14]

Max Muller edit

Buddhist studies edit

Pali Text Society edit

Popular interest and Orientalism edit

Transcendentalists edit

Theosophical Society edit

Reaction edit

Mutual cultural exchange edit

Since the beginning of the 19th century, modernisation movements appeared in eastern countries and cultures, such as the Brahmo Samaj and Neo-Vedanta in India, Dharmapala's Maha Bodhi Society, and Buddhist modernism in Japan.

India edit

Modern Hinduism edit

Brahmo Samaj edit

Vivekananda edit

Sri Lanka edit

China edit

Japan edit

Indonesia edit

Export of "traditional" religions edit

Modern Hinduism edit

Vivekananda edit

Aurobindo edit

Radhakrishnan edit

Ramana Maharshi and Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj edit

Osho edit

Vipassana edit

Zen edit

Mutual syncretism edit

In the west, as aerly as the 19th century the Transcendentalists were influenced by Eastern religions, followed by the Theosophical Society, New Thought, Western Buddhism, the Perennial Philosophy of Aldous Huxley, New Age and Nondualism.

Perennial Philosophy edit

Nondualism edit

Postcolonialism edit

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ Sweetman mentions:
  2. ^ See Rajiv Malhotra and Being Different for a critic who gained widespread attention outside the academia.
  3. ^ Sweetman cites Richard King (1999) p.128.[11]
  4. ^ Sweetman cites Viswanathan (2003), Colonialism and the Construction of Hinduism, p.26

References edit

  1. ^ McMahan 2008. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMcMahan2008 (help)
  2. ^ Michaels 2004.
  3. ^ Sharf 1993. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFSharf1993 (help)
  4. ^ Sharf & 1995-B.
  5. ^ Gombrich 1996.
  6. ^ Morgan 2001, p. 9-11.
  7. ^ Brugger 1983, p. 1–3.
  8. ^ Dixon 1999, p. 1–4.
  9. ^ Kendall 2007, p. 11.
  10. ^ a b c Sweetman 2004.
  11. ^ a b c King 1999. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFKing1999 (help)
  12. ^ Nussbaum 2009.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h Sweetman 2004, p. 13.
  14. ^ a b c Sweetamn 2004, p. 13.
  15. ^ Sweetman 2013, p. 13-14.
  16. ^ Sweetman 2004, p. 13-14.
  17. ^ a b c d e Sweetman 2004, p. 14.
  18. ^ Sweetman 2004, p. 14-15.
  19. ^ a b c d e Sweetamn 2004, p. 15.
  20. ^ Sweetamn 2004, p. 15, 16.

Sources edit

Printed sources edit

  • Brugger, Bill (1983), Modernization and revolution, Routledge, ISBN 0-7099-0695-1 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Dixon, Simon M. (1999), The modernisation of Russia, 1676-1825, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-37961-X
  • Gombrich, Richard F. (1996), Theravada Buddhism. A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo, London and New York: Routledge
  • Kendall, Diana (2007), Sociology in Our Times
  • King, Richard (1999), Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East", Routledge
  • McMahan, David L. (2008), The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195183276
  • Michaels, Axel (2004), Hinduism. Past and present, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
  • Morgan, Diane (2001), The Best Guide to Eastern Philosophy and Religion, St. Martin's Griffin, ISBN 1-58063-197-5
  • Nussbaum, Martha C. (2009). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03059-6.
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1993), "The Zen of Japanese Nationalism", History of Religions, Vol. 33, No. 1. (Aug., 1993), pp. 1-43.
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1995-A), Whose Zen? Zen Nationalism Revisited (PDF) {{citation}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1995-B), "Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience" (PDF), NUMEN, vol.42 (1995) {{citation}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1995-C), "Sanbokyodan. Zen and the Way of the New Religions" (PDF), Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 1995 22/3-4 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  • Sharf, Robert H. (2000), The Rhetoric of Experience and the Study of Religion. In: Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 267-87 (PDF)
  • Sweetman, Will (2004), "The prehistory of Orientalism: Colonialism and the Textual Basis for Bartholomaus Ziegenbalg's Account of Hinduism", New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 6, 2 (December, 2004): 12-38

Web-sources edit

Further reading edit

  • King, Richard (1999), Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and "The Mystic East", Routledge
  • McMahan, David L. (2008), The Making of Buddhist Modernism, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780195183276
  • Sharf, Robert H. (1993), "The Zen of Japanese Nationalism", History of Religions, Vol. 33, No. 1. (Aug., 1993), pp. 1-43.

External links edit