"Holding" field not working?

edit

  Fixed

The "holding" parameter does not appear to work. For example, Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc., Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, & McLean v. Arkansas (just to pick the first three transclusions in the list at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Infobox United States District Court case) all include holdings; but the holding does not appear in the infobox. Specifying the "holding" parameter does cause the heading Holding to appear; but not the text of the holding itself. TJRC (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I figured it out and fixed it. Please revert and let me know if this munges anything. TJRC (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can someone add a "plaintiff" field?

edit

Can someone add a "plaintiff" field? I would do it myself, but I do not want to accidentally break a complex template. Right now we have "prosecution" and "defendant" - and "prosecution" is clearly incorrect in a civil case. Thanks --Neutralitytalk 03:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Why no "counsel for defendant" field?

edit

or counsel for defendants(s) Thanks Rhadow (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I was unable to get the image to load for DDC when leaving image and imagesize blank

edit
USA vs whoever
 
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case name USA vs whoever
Defendantwhoever
PlaintiffUnited States of America
Citation1 U.S.C. § 2.
Court membership
Judge sittingJudge Judge

Geo8rge (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The problem seems to be the infobox template was not updated to include the image variable discussed in Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case#Technical_information. In my sandbox that code solved the problem. I don't know if I should make the change without authorization. Should I? Geo8rge (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply