Template talk:Infobox officeholder
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox officeholder template. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Template:Infobox officeholder is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
Template not displaying correctly on Charles Harper (politician)
editI recently made changes to Charles Harper (politician) to include all of their offices, but have noticed that under the first office ("2nd Speaker of the Western Australian Legislative Assembly") the predecessor and successor are not showing. I have checked all of the parameters and can't find any errors. Both fields were showing at multiple points when I was previewing the changes I was making but in the final published edit the information isn't displaying. Can someone please tell me what I've done wrong and how to correct it? Adam Black talk • contributions 20:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have managed to fix this myself by appending "1" to each of the parameters for that office, but I'm going to leave this discussion here as it does seem like there is an issue with the template. For the edit I was referring to above, see here. Adam Black talk • contributions 20:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Add criminal fields
editJohn Politician | |
---|---|
Representative Example | |
Criminal charge | doing crime |
Penalty | wrist slapping |
Because there is a growing list of politicians turned criminals, I propose that we add fields (criminal_charge, convinction_penalty, and conviction_status) from Template:Infobox criminal to Template:Infobox officeholder in the same way that they have been made available in Template:Infobox person.
Currently, there is a dispute about adding an instance of Template:Infobox criminal to the page of Donald Trump following his criminal conviction. Given that some argue that the use of Template:Infobox criminal is too strong, the amendment of Template:Infobox officeholder as previously mentioned could provide a compromise. Bgregz (talk) 00:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Criminal-related parameters can already be available via module - see example right. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was not aware of this, thank you! Bgregz (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- What was the rationale for incorporating those parameters into {{infobox person}} rather than using that infobox's
|module=
parameter? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 03:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- It appears that the criminal parameters there predate the implementation of
|module=
. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that the criminal parameters there predate the implementation of
Issue with spouse param
editThe spouse parameter is causing issues on articles eg. Rishi Sunak, Donald Trump 93.37.105.221 (talk) 11:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- That seems to have been fixed. It was caused by changes at Template:If both. Toadspike [Talk] 12:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Template rendering messed up
editThe rendering is completely messed up on the wiki of many politicians. It is displaying an "ambassador to" field below all tables.
Eg: Narendra Modi, Rishi Sunak
am not able to add screenshots Skratata69 (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- yes, somebody fucked up Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 11:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes RWILD✉ 11:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yep! The last edits to the template were by User:Jdlrobson on 5 April 2024. I don't know if this is the cause or if something else has happened. It looks very unprofessional at the moment. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 12:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I came here to report the same problem. I noticed it on the page Pete Buttigieg. Gottagotospace (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I just posted on the Talk page of the user who last edited the template. Hopefully they can help! Gottagotospace (talk) 12:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
This has now been fixed. Not sure how or why. Toadspike [Talk] 12:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's still showing up incorrectly on some pages. Maybe it needs time to "refresh" everywhere? Gottagotospace (talk) 12:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, likely cache issues.
- Just noting that I've made this a subsection of the one above - the issue was with an embedded template, which has now been fixed. Primefac (talk) 16:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Edit request on 18 June 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Clean ndivs; implement my edit today in this template's sandbox page. Santiago Claudio (talk) 06:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Santiago Claudio: I have no idea what "ndivs" means. What is the purpose of your edit? SilverLocust 💬 07:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Align with edit by administrator Izno to Template:Infobox person last April with a summary of "clean ndivs." Santiago Claudio (talk) 08:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Izno: Could you clarify what "clean ndivs" means (and/or comment on this requested edit here)? SilverLocust 💬 09:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- No idea where the n came from, but basically the gist is that all the blocks in that template didn't need to be in the br-separated entries, they could just use divs normally. Izno (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Izno: Could you clarify what "clean ndivs" means (and/or comment on this requested edit here)? SilverLocust 💬 09:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Align with edit by administrator Izno to Template:Infobox person last April with a summary of "clean ndivs." Santiago Claudio (talk) 08:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: I already made this change here a while ago. Izno (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Caliph
editCan you add a caliph=
parameter ? A lot articles about Islamic governors/generals use monarch=
which is wrong. I know its possible to add it with xblanknamey
but thats too much hassle AlexBobCharles (talk) 17:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Edit request on 24 July 2024
editIt is requested that an edit be made to the template-protected template at Template:Infobox officeholder. (edit · history · last · links · sandbox · edit sandbox · sandbox history · sandbox last edit · sandbox diff · test cases · transclusion count · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.
Edit requests to template-protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. Consider making changes first to the template's sandbox and test them thoroughly here before submitting an edit request. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |
To any administrator, apply these, my previous edits to this infobox's sandbox:
− |
| abovestyle = -- | + |
| abovestyle = {{{abovestyle|}}}
| above = {{#if:{{{honorific prefix|{{{honorific_prefix|{{{honorific-prefix|}}}}}}}}}|<div class="honorific-prefix" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 77%;">{{{honorific prefix|{{{honorific_prefix|{{{honorific-prefix}}}}}}}}}</div>}}<div class="fn">{{#if:{{{name|}}}|{{{name}}}|{{PAGENAMEBASE}}}}</div>{{#if:{{{honorific suffix|{{{honorific_suffix|{{{honorific-suffix|}}}}}}}}}|<div class="honorific-suffix" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 77%;">{{{honorific suffix|{{{honorific_suffix|{{{honorific-suffix}}}}}}}}}</div>
|
Santiago Claudio (talk) 02:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Above at #Edit request on 18 June 2024, I asked for an explanation of the purpose of this edit. The explanation given (
Align with edit by administrator Izno to Template:Infobox person last April with a summary of "clean ndivs."
) did not make it any clearer. SilverLocust 💬 10:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)- Not done pending an explanation * Pppery * it has begun... 20:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- This request is for alignment with
|abovestyle=
and|above=
in {{Infobox person}}. Santiago Claudio (talk) 02:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- This request is for alignment with
- Not done pending an explanation * Pppery * it has begun... 20:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Age and Deceased status
editIt seems important to have the age and status of whether a given politician is deceased in a fairly obvious place in the infobox for officeholders. The current state is that there can optionally be a personal information section which contains this below the entire list of political positions, so that instead of being listed clerly, most politician's infoboxes omit the entire "Personal data" section - this seems much worse than having the living status / age highlighted at the top. Davidmanheim (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's certainly a valid perspective on things, but the way to do it is to embed in an infobox that makes birth and death more prominent, such as
{{Infobox person|module=
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanisaac (talk • contribs) 06:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC){{Infobox officeholder|embed=yes}}
}}
- I don't see the issue here. Most politician articles are of deceased persons. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Military Rank
editWhat is the common practice when using the |rank= parameter if the officeholder held a higher rank than the one with which they separated military service?
As a case in point, Tim Walz held the rank of Command Sergeant Major (provisional), but retired as Master Sergeant, a lower rank. Should this parameter be highest rank, or last rank held? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 03:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is already being discussed extensively at Talk:Tim Walz, so a new discussion about that person should not be started here. I think you'll have better results if you post a query at Template talk:Infobox military person asking people to visit that article's discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 10 August 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Nobold in parameter "native name". Diff:
− | subheader = {{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{embed}}}}}|yes||{{#if: | + | subheader = {{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{embed}}}}}|yes||{{#if:{{nobold|{{{native_name|}}}}}|{{#if:{{{native_name_lang|}}}|<div class="nickname" lang="{{{native_name_lang}}}">}}{{nobold|{{{native_name}}}}}{{#if:{{{native_name_lang|}}}|</div>}}}}}} |
MykolaHK (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. I don't think the proposed code will work correctly, but it should be easy to find out in the sandbox. Do you have consensus for this formatting change? – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Education vs Alma mater
editWhat's the difference between those two fields? Should academic degrees go into the education field? Or is the education field for schools / universities that a subject enrolled in but not graduate from so that they are part of the subject's education but are not an alma mater for them? Or is the education field for non-academic education, i.e. elementary school, middle school, high school (and vocational school?)? Nakonana (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- I apply the instructions from {{infobox person}}.The
|education=
field is forEducation, e.g., degree, institution and graduation year, if relevant. If very little information is available or relevant, the
The|alma_mater=
parameter may be more appropriate.|alma_mater=
parameter is a more concise alternative to (not addition to)
— Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)|education=
, and will often consist of the linked name of the last-attended institution of higher education (not secondary schools). It is usually not relevant to include either parameter for non-graduates, but article talk page consensus may conclude otherwise, as perhaps at Bill Gates.- That helps, thanks :) Nakonana (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)