Template talk:GAList/check
 | Template:GAList/check is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
 | This template was considered for deletion on 29 July 2010. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Merger with sym edit
Someone has made a similar template at {{sym}}, for which I provided documentation (I just hate to see an undocumented template.) This is not widely used; but I feel that these symbols generally should not be hidden under a subtemplate of a process and so on; one of the difficulties if one at all engages in "process" as opposed to editing articles is finding the templates necessary which are a secret of those who know the process. So, although no doubt GAList/check and others have more provenance etc, I think it would be a good thing to try to move them towards a more common template, and {{sym}} seems better than a subtemplate 
. Comments please. Si Trew (talk) 13:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 13 May 2019 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace with the current version of the sandbox (diff). This add a separate default image, 
, when one isn't specified are the given parameter isn't recognized, rather than defaulting to the neutral symbol. This is following the defaults in Template:GAProgress, which use this image for unevaluated criteria. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 February 2023 edit
| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Fix typo as shown in the sandbox – "netural" should be "neutral", but keeping both for backward compatibility since I can't tell if any of the 39K+ transclusions use the misspelling.
This change will also allow this template to be used in {{GAProgress}} (and simplify that template's output when subst'd). Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Completed, and thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 23:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Thanks! Just one more edit from the sandbox – this adds "question" and "huh" from {{GAProgress}} that I'd overlooked. That should be everything! Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also edited. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 07:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Thanks! Just one more edit from the sandbox – this adds "question" and "huh" from {{GAProgress}} that I'd overlooked. That should be everything! Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
