Template talk:CongLinks

Template:CongLinks is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

U.S. Congress Template‑class High‑importance

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This template has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This template is about one (or many) Person(s).

United States: Government Template‑class

	United States portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This template is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

This template was considered for deletion on 3 January 2014. The result of the discussion was "limit/shorten the number of links".

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Ballotpedia inclusion? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wondering about including Ballotpedia.org for congressional - and other - political offices, campaigns.Doug Grinbergs (talk) 01:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Newline edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

It's being displayed unless removing it in article. --5.43.86.137 (talk); 10:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC) [e]Reply

=one external link line (x)
=one external link line (x)
=one external link line (x)
=one external link line (x)

=one external link line (CongLinks)

--5.43.86.137 (talk); 11:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC) [e]Reply

Template-protected edit request on 14 September 2022 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit template-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Change the order of the links to be more alphabetical and less random. This would go:

Effectively, this would just be moving Vote Smart from second place to fourth place, and moving FEC and LOC up a place. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 11:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic