Talk:Zuihō-class aircraft carrier/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) 06:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

• "The Zuihō class (瑞鳳型?) aircraft carriers were a group of two ships built" --> "The Zuihō class (瑞鳳型?) was a group of two aircraft carriers built"
• "Both ships were originally built as submarine tenders and but were subsequently converted into carriers."
• "Operation MO" --> "Operation Mo"
• fuelled vs refueling vs refuelling
• "had to wait to be rescued as" --> "had to await rescue as"
• "Around 1400, the destroyer Sazanami returned to the scene and rescued the remaining survivors.[18] She found only 203, the rest of her crew of 834 died during the attack or in the water awaiting rescue." --> "Around 1400, the destroyer Sazanami returned to the scene and rescued only 203 survivors, the rest of her crew of 834 died during the attack or in the water awaiting rescue.[18][19]"
• MOS advocates the inclusion of alt text.
• Add {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Zuihō'' class aircraft carrier}}
• The third source under "References" is mis-formatted.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

All done, except that Japanese code names had both letters capitalized and alt text is not a requirement. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)