Talk:Woodsmith Mine

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Woodsmith Mine is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Harrietrichmond (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (I work for this company.)

Requested move 29 March 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved: @The joy of all things: please update the article's lead accordingly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

York Potash Ltd → Woodsmith Mine – Originally named as York Potash, who are now part of Sirius Minerals. Because the company has already been bought out (and could happen again) the format of naming the venture after the mine and not the company should be adhered to. EG Boulby Mine, not Israel Chemicals, Kellingley Colliery not UK Coal The joy of all things (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Support - I anticipate this to be an uncontroversial move, however, just in case of any objections, I have posted here for consensus. My reasons for are given in the template above. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support In the absence of any evidence abut the WP:COMMONNAME, this seems like a good way to ensure the stability of the article title. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic