Talk:Yaropolk Iziaslavich
(Redirected from Talk:Yaropolk Izyaslavich)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
Yaropolk Iziaslavich has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the 11th century Duke Yaropolk Izyaslavich is an Eastern Orthodox saint? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On at Talk:Ukraine after the Russian Revolution#Requested move 13 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Yaropolk Izyaslavich to Yaropolk Iziaslavich. The result of [[Special:Permalink/1135082407#Requested move at Talk:Ukraine after the Russian Revolution#Requested move 13 January 2023|the discussion]] was moved. |
GA Review edit
- It is reasonably well written:
- Pass. The article is well written although there are a few typos in the lead.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Pass. The article seems to be accurate and has numerous citations and references.
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass. The article seems to have a broad coverage of the topic. It has a section describing the Yaropolk's family background as well as a legacy section.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- 'Pass. The article follows WP:NPOV.
- It is stable:
- Pass. Yes, the article is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass. Yes, the article has numerous images and it is also strongly backed up by an infobox and a template.
- Overall:
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)