Talk:William de Longchamp/GA1

(Redirected from Talk:William Longchamp/GA1)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
Decent prose, 7/10
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Minor comments

edit
  • "He was born in Normandy, and some of the later difficulties he had governing England for King Richard I of England may have been due to his differing views of government from the English." - can you be a little clearer? I think you mean that he was raised under a different political system and brought his understanding of politics to Britain, but its not totally clear.
  • "but this is unlikely" - why?
  • "On Richard's accession" - although I know what you mean, perhaps explain this a little more clearly for those unfamiliar with the royal meaning of accession.
  • Northampton Castle, Tickhill Castle and Dover Castle have their own articles, link to them.
  • Decide whether priory should be capitalised or not and be consistant.
  • Capitalise Emperor when referring to a specific one.

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply