Talk:Vuélveme a Querer (Cristian Castro song)/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DivaKnockouts (talk · contribs) 04:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • Link compilation album
  • "The song speaks of a protagonist who begs his lover to come back after being without her for a long time." — Not to fond of "to come back after being without her for a long time.", consider re-wording. :)
  • "In the United States, the song peaked at number two on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs and number one on the Billboard Latin Pop Songs." — Missing a word (charts at the end of the sentence)
  • "It received Billboard Latin Music Award and a Lo Nuestro nomination for Pop Song of the Year the following year." — Missing a word ("a" after "received" and before "Billboard")
  • "Lührs received an award at the Pop/Rock category on the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) Awards of 1997." → "Lührs received an award in the Pop/Rock category at the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) Awards of 1997."
Background and lyrics
  • He re-recorded the song? Hm, I'd be happier with information supporting what concert it was taken from or if it's from a tour. (If that information is available, that is)
  • Link live album.
Reception
  • ""Vuélveme a Querer" was released on radio stations on September 1995 and debuted at number fifteen on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart on the week of September 9, 1995." → "Vuélveme a Querer" was released to radio stations in September 1995 and debuted at number fifteen on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart for the week of September 9, 1995."
  • "On the Billboard Latin Pop Songs chart, the song debuted at number thirteen on the chart." — Redundant use of "chart".
  • " It was also nominated Pop Song of the Year at the 1996 Lo Nuestro Awards which went to Enrique Iglesias for his song "Si Tú Te Vas"." — Missing a word ("for" after "nominated" and before "Pop".)
Charts
  • Did the song not rank on the Latin Pop Songs Year-End chart? If it spent fourteen weeks at number then, I'm sure it did.
You know, I actually had the 1995 Year-End charts. But I didn't archive it and the issue is missing on Google Books. Stupid Billboard. >:(
References
  • FN#1 — No italics to Allmusic. Not a printed source per WP:CITEHOW
  • FN#2 — WP:CITEHOW
  • FN#4 — WP:CITEHOW
  • FN#5 — Link Billboard and Prometheus Global Media, as it is the first time you use them in the references.
  • FN#6 — Accessdate missing.
  • FN#7 — See FN#6.
  • FN#9 — See FN#7.
  • FN#10 — Work and publisher parameters missing.
  • FN#12 — Volume missing.

Putting article   On hold until minor issues have been resolved. — DivaKnockouts 05:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I'll start working on the problem once I finished up Mi Reflejo's GAN review. Erick (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
That will be fine. — DivaKnockouts 03:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I should have this started on the weekend. Erick (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

How is it now? Erick (talk) 04:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Looks good. Great job Erick! — DivaKnockouts 02:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply