Talk:Vikramaditya
![]() | Vikramaditya was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 3, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vikramaditya article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Vikramaditya
editIn ancient times, Indian mothers used to tell stories to their children about the name of a king called Vikramaditya. At that time, the name Vikramaditya was very popular. But King Vikramaditya was fictional. At that time, ancient Indian mothers used to tell their children that King Vikramaditya ruled the whole of Asia. But nothing like that. Indian people of that time named Chandragupta II as Vikramaditya. The name of Chandragupta II's kingdom was Gupta Empire. This Gupta Empire was not so big. Youshan Ahmed (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. SKAG123 (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2023 (UTC)