Talk:Tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite

(Redirected from Talk:Tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Volcanoman7 in topic Feedback from volcanoman7

Check list

edit

1. Archean Eon

2. Verb Tense

3. Pronounce & logic links

4. Post Archean TTG intro: two settings

5. Detailed studies classified Archean TTGs into three groups based on geochemical features, that are low, medium, and high pressure TTGs, although the three groups form a continuous evolution. Make it more clear

6. Geodynamic setting intro: highlight the controversy.

7. Archean TTG plate tectonic setting controversy: make it more focused on ideas but not schools. e.g. XX is debated.

8. heat pipe

9. why T, T & G are classified as a suite? compositional similarity (graph)

10. Write to general audiences

11. Iceland, Himalayas


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Adayding (talkcontribs) 04:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply 

Feed back from Blessing

edit

Good work! 1. On the Tectonic setting section, the first three lines could make starting statement for the section because it directly stated the reasons for relating TTG formation with tectonic origin. It can be followed with the geochemical characteristics that you started with.

2. Under the continental arc TTG section, the rock was related to subduction. Since subduction was first mention there and it is fundamental to their formation, I think you should either add an hyperlink or provide a concise definition of the term or both. BlessingAdeoti (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from Michelle

edit

1. In the Non-Plate Tectonic Setting section, seems that it can be sub-divided into delamination induced TTG and underplating induced TTG. You may consider adding two sub-headings below the Non-Plate Tectonic Setting section to divide the paragraphs instead of a bulk text.

2. You have scale of depth for the Archean hot subduction hypothesis, it maybe great to have scale of depth for the diagram showing delamination and underplating.

3. Why TTG can be found in ophiolite? I think it would be great to have one to two sentences explaining this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myip003 (talkcontribs) 15:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Modern TTG suites

edit

TTG suites at the present day are produced within subduction systems where a spreading ridge is undergoing subduction, such as the Chile ridge and the South American subduction zone. This means an analogy between ridge/hotter than normal ocean crust and the process of Archaean tectonics can be made. ClimberDave 15:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tonalite-Trondhjemite-Granodiorite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from volcanoman7

edit

I note there has been a recent reference added to the page. The reference is - Archean continental crust formed by magma hybridization and voluminous partial melting. The paper was recently published and I wonder if it is just an author trying to insert their paper to get attention. The ideas in the paper do not strike me as anything new or distinguishing. My suggest would be to remove the reference and see how the paper gets referenced in the future. Volcanoman7 (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply