Talk:Tommy James (American football)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tommy James (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Just want to say thanks for picking this up and that I'm here and ready to address any issues and answer any queries. --Batard0 (talk) 18:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• "1950s. James was born" -> "1950s. He was born"
  • Done. --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• " he starred as a back" not sure on the neutrality of saying "starred".
  • Changed to "played." --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• "he followed Brown to Ohio State, where he played as" second "he", strictly speaking it's unclear whether it's James or Brown you're referring to here.
  • Rephrased to eliminate the second use of "he." --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• "He went to grammar" He attended?
  • Fixed.--Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• Consider linking grammar school.
  • Linked.--Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• Consider linking touchdown. I know it's obvious to you but it's not obvious to all international readers.
  • Linked.--Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• I would expect win-loss to use an en-dash, just like the record itself does!
  • Done.--Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• "James had an interception" do you mean he "made" one or "suffered" one?
  • Made one. Changed. --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• "as he got older" not keen on this phrase, perhaps "as an older player" or something?
  • Put in "later in his career". --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• What does "on waivers" mean?
  • It means you allow other teams to employ him on the same contractual terms as you signed him on. If a player "clears waivers" it means no team wanted to pick up the contract, and at that point he's free to make a new contract with any team. I linked it and briefly described it. --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
• Ref 17 title could use an en-dash.
  • Fixed. --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Just the comments above to be addressed regarding prose improvement.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A few minor prose issues, otherwise no problems here, I'll place it on hold for a week until I'm notified that the article has been updated. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

• All issues above are addressed, I believe, but I'm happy to make any additional adjustments. Thanks, and this certainly makes the article better. --Batard0 (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)