Talk:Infra-Man

She Demon

I thought Witch Eye's name was actually She Demon - I've read that before & I am pretty sure Princess Dragon Mom called her that @ some point in the American version.

• I came here to post the exact the thing. In the English dub that I saw their names were Princess Dragon Mom & She-Demon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.23.79.204 (talk) 02:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Misnamed Monsters

"Spider Monster" is actually called Bug Monster Infra-Man: Monsters

"Fire Dragon" is actually called Scaley Monster Infra-Man: Monsters

"Long-Haired Monster" is actually called Bull Monster Infra-Man: Monsters

"Iron Armor Monsters" are actually called Twin Monsters Infra-Man: Monsters

"Mutant Drill" is correct, but in the American version they change it's name to Nemesis Infra-Man: Monsters

Also, all of the monsters appear to have elite martial arts skills in addition to their specific "magical" weapons — Preceding unsigned comment added by LKingswood (talk • contribs) 19:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Professor Liu & Mei Mei.jpg

Image:Professor Liu & Mei Mei.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Inframan DvD Cover.jpeg

Image:Inframan DvD Cover.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Witch Eye 3.jpg

Image:Witch Eye 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Inframan Razor Blade.jpg

Image:Inframan Razor Blade.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

"Philippine Released"?

This section claims to be sourced from a Roger Ebert review of The Mighty Peking Man. I find no reference to this Pinoy Inframan there or indeed anywhere on the Internet besides this entry. I therefore question its notability if it is even real. I've certainly never encountered these claims before, and the whole section is poorly written and utterly nonsensical.

Not sure how this qualifies as "verifiable encyclopedic content."184.156.151.91 (talk) 05:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC) C. Elam

I believe it should be deleted then. I, too, found no source anywhere of this supposed Pinoy Inframan.