![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I am bothered by 72.8.95.36's rewriting of the article. I looks canned (though I don't find it in a google search) with some rather POV analysis. Also, some relevent info seems to have been removed. Other opinions? -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think you are referring to me, and in the interest of disclosure, I can explain this. This newer "canned" entry was taken verbatim by me from the unpublished but upcoming Encyclopedia of Jewish American Literature. See here: [1] However, I was the one that wrote the article for said Encyclopedia before posting it here. At the time I posted this, I didn't know if the encyclopedia was going to be published, and so I posted it here, since it was more thorough than the article that existed. Therefore it is not plagiarism, since I wrote it. I do not recall ever signing any official release of copyright, though. So I think it is OK to remain here--unless someone from the publisher reads the article and thinks that their entry has been plagiarized from here! Phrenology (talk) 04:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. As long as you didn't make some sort of agreement that someone else has exclusive copyright on what you wrote, I imagine its fine on avoiding any plagerism or copyright problem. I had some concern with some material previously in the article removed, but if no other editors here are bothered, I shan't be either. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)