Talk:The London
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Credits
editThe infobox now has the songs listed as a "Single by Young Thug, J. Cole and Travis Scott" when previously it was a "Single by Young Thug featuring J. Cole and Travis Scott". I believe it should have Cole and Scott listed as featured artists, as that's how it's listed on YouTube, Apple Music, Spotify and Tidal. I believe the only place that co-bills all three artists is the Billboard charts but that shouldn't matter. For now, I'm reverting back to the original way it was (using the word "featuring") and I suggest anyone opposed responds to this message. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 22:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I noticed you removed the word "featuring" based on Spotify (which has J. Cole and Travis Scott as featured artists) and the artwork, which isn't a fair assessment. Cover art doesn't necessarily indicate anything. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 22:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: Oh God, here we go again. Yes, cover art just means absolutely nothing. It's so irrelevant I don't even know why they bothered making cover art! This stuff about "not a fair assessment"...what? How was anything I said not a fair assessment, but yours apparently is? I said the credits are not consistent across every platform. I think that's pretty damn "fair". Just like the editors at Call You Mine, you can get consensus for your changes. Proposing a change on the talk page and saying "I'm going to do this" is all well and good until somebody disagrees with you, and I do. Don't edit war either. Ss112 03:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: So are you basing your assessment solely on the styling of a cover art rather than what's listed on all streaming services? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: Literally stop edit warring or you're being reported to an admin. I didn't "remove" featuring, you or somebody else added it. I created the article buddy, and I had them all on equal credit based on what I saw. Ss112 04:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Ok, so based on what you see now what do you say? As I pointed out, Spotify has them listed as features. Please don't be stubborn just because you created the article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: I'm being "stubborn" because you think you're justified in edit warring to retain something you think I removed, when I'm telling you I know the way the article was originally because I created it. My pointing out I created the article is not me saying my opinion is right and everybody else is wrong. I'm saying get consensus—consensus cannot be reached by two editors who disagree with each other, so I do not need to keep discussing here. That does not mean you can then restore the article to say "featuring" because an editor who disagrees with you doesn't want to keep pointlessly arguing. I'm sure you know how to start a discussion to reach consensus. Now please stop pinging me, the article is on my watchlist. Thanks. Ss112 04:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I added the word "featuring", as did KidMotion. I saw that you had reverted based on "Not on Spotify, not on the cover art. Leave it as it was". That's why I searched up the Spotify credits. I don't think I'm justified in edit warring, I just made a bold edit and one revert since you didn't actually add anything to the talk page discussion. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:13, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: I'm being "stubborn" because you think you're justified in edit warring to retain something you think I removed, when I'm telling you I know the way the article was originally because I created it. My pointing out I created the article is not me saying my opinion is right and everybody else is wrong. I'm saying get consensus—consensus cannot be reached by two editors who disagree with each other, so I do not need to keep discussing here. That does not mean you can then restore the article to say "featuring" because an editor who disagrees with you doesn't want to keep pointlessly arguing. I'm sure you know how to start a discussion to reach consensus. Now please stop pinging me, the article is on my watchlist. Thanks. Ss112 04:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Ok, so based on what you see now what do you say? As I pointed out, Spotify has them listed as features. Please don't be stubborn just because you created the article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: Literally stop edit warring or you're being reported to an admin. I didn't "remove" featuring, you or somebody else added it. I created the article buddy, and I had them all on equal credit based on what I saw. Ss112 04:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: So are you basing your assessment solely on the styling of a cover art rather than what's listed on all streaming services? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: Oh God, here we go again. Yes, cover art just means absolutely nothing. It's so irrelevant I don't even know why they bothered making cover art! This stuff about "not a fair assessment"...what? How was anything I said not a fair assessment, but yours apparently is? I said the credits are not consistent across every platform. I think that's pretty damn "fair". Just like the editors at Call You Mine, you can get consensus for your changes. Proposing a change on the talk page and saying "I'm going to do this" is all well and good until somebody disagrees with you, and I do. Don't edit war either. Ss112 03:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
@Ss112: Also based the credits solely on cover art makes me believe you've never seen the cover art for singles such as "Monster"? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 04:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Thought it was worth noting that the new music video released today is titled "Young Thug - The London ft. J. Cole & Travis Scott [Official Video]" and was uploaded by Young Thug's YouTube account. This is consistent with what is listed on all streaming services. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 22:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)