Talk:The Last Supper (photograph)
(Redirected from Talk:The Last Supper (photo))
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Last Supper (photograph) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from The Last Supper (photograph) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 16:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the most expensive Israeli photo was inspired by Leonardo and was described as "homoerotic challenge to Israeli machismo"? Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20180730021340/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/19/arts/design/19real.html
Created by Artem.G (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Last Supper (photo); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- @Artem.G: Very interesting article. I'm willing to donate a QPQ if you need one. BorgQueen (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- BorgQueen thanks, but not needed - I was just looking for an interesting article to review :) qpq is done now. Artem.G (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Very good. I feel too involved to review this article so I'll let another reviewer take a look. BorgQueen (talk) 20:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - see below
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Great piece of work. The article was created on May 5, 2023. Long enough [4211 characters], neutral, and sourced. Hook is interesting and well cited. A picture is a must for this DYK that is free and clear. It has an [Earwig score of 51.3% because of a long quote] RV (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- I had a to search a bit to put the two parts of the hook together. So not sure about the piped title most expensive but I see how the auction price is used to support the claim. I will promote and see if this works. I also see the long quote Earwig trip. Bruxton (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)