Talk:Cross Bath
 | A fact from Cross Bath appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Title edit
Should the definite article be part of the title? Peter I. Vardy (talk) 07:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, don't think so. --Ettrig (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- All of the references use it as a title ie "The Cross Bath", but I'd be happy for it to be moved to Cross Bath, Bath or even Cross Bath (because Bath,Bath is clumsy) and there don't seem to be any others - hopefully it would then comply with the MOS.— Rod talk 18:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- But in the text of the references it almost always reads "the Cross Bath". I've had a look on Google and even some of the titles found there are just "Cross Bath". Also I could not find a Google link to any other "cross bath", so IMO "Cross Bath" would be the best title.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- All of the references use it as a title ie "The Cross Bath", but I'd be happy for it to be moved to Cross Bath, Bath or even Cross Bath (because Bath,Bath is clumsy) and there don't seem to be any others - hopefully it would then comply with the MOS.— Rod talk 18:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I think the first sentence should say what kind of object the Cross Bath is (building?) and what it is used for (bathing). The wikipedia article about bath does not say that it is a building to bathe in. Is it? A pool to bathe in? As in bird bath. I am surprised to find such a mundane part of the English language that I know so little about. --Ettrig (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cross Bath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071102122621/http://www.romanbaths.co.uk/index.cfm?fuseAction=SM.nav&UUID=F9F320C4-1A95-4C04-AC609094E5B5DFD3 to http://www.romanbaths.co.uk/index.cfm?fuseAction=SM.nav&UUID=F9F320C4-1A95-4C04-AC609094E5B5DFD3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)