Talk:Tamizh Padam 2

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in February 2018.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Spoof list edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Re: edits like this and this that introduce content about "notable spoofs", you folks need to seek consensus for the inclusion of this content, as it is largely interpretive (i.e. requires you to personally identify the spoofs, as opposed to noting ones that the media have noticed) and is a seemingly indiscriminate list better suited for a fan website. I'm also unaware of any comparable list being included in any other "spoof" film, but if someone would like to argue that there is significant precedent, feel free. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Terminator92: Since you have restored a significant portion of this[1][2], what is the academic value of this content besides just a maniacal list best suited for a fansite like Wikia? And what is the precedent for an article containing this much detail about spoofs? How is this content in conformity with WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE when there is no supplementary information to provide context? Even in films like Hot Shots!, which was very spoof heavy, we don't see indiscriminate lists for each of the spoofs. Same with Scary Movie, where only a few of the main films spoofed are listed. And since the section is "notable spoofs", what is "notable" about these? It sounds like the film just poked fun at everything it could think of, rather than presenting a few spoofs in any sort of meaningful way. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic