Talk:Tenby Schools Penang
(Redirected from Talk:Tenby International School, Penang)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Pigsonthewing in topic Further reading
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tenby Schools Penang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Further reading edit
I won't remove them while there's an AfD in process, lest it be thought underhand, but the articles currently in "Further reading" look like churned press releases, and are not sufficiently significant to be included in the article long-term, should it not be deleted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I think you're exagerating to be quite honest, though the New Straits Times artilce looks like it doesn't contain much 'journalism', I agree! However, I do notice that at least one article is not about the Penang school at all, for example this one (Miri). I think it is fair to remove it. Sionk (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Press releases are reliable sources. I like to add extra sources that aren't integrated into the text into the further reading section so editors quickly see them and know they can expand the article with them. If you prefer, you can move them to the talk page. I worry that editors might not always check the talk page, especially if it's a stub. But then I spoke to a different editor and he said he wouldn't check the further reading section but would check the talk page, so maybe it's good to duplicate them. --Odie5533 (talk) 21:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply to both] I didn't comment, here, about the suitability of these articles as reliable sources. They're not suitable to be in a "further reading" section, per WP:EL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)