Talk:Tai Chi Chih

(Redirected from Talk:Tai chi chih)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 29 June 2023

Ruler exercises edit

This page might cause confusion with the taiji chih, tai chi ruler, exercises. The latter were conceived by chen tuan ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_Tuan ).

Also see blog: http://www.chichiangtao.com/

also: 太极智 translates as Taiji Wisdom. pinyin: tai4 ji2 zhi4

beter is: 太極尺 taiji chi Taiji Ruler (length of one foot) pinyin: tai4 ji2 chi3

LaoshiPeer (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The exercise using a short wooden stick supported between the hands to maintain their coordinated relation is misleadingly named 'tai chi' chih or ruler. Although it may seem to be related, the Ruler exercises are explained by a differing set of principles. The often recorded claim that the Ruler exercises originates from the Song Dynasty court taoist Chen Tuan of Bo village is completely false; this makes it doubtful that its lineage was received and transfered via the Chao Family. website: [1] 124.122.81.46 (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2013 (UTC)dr.k.conor.foxxReply

References

Requested move 29 June 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Tai chi chihTai Chi Chih – According to the article, this is a trademarked name, like Bikram Yoga. Per MOS:TM, trademarks should be capped. See also MOS:SPORTCAPS. In the body of the article, the name already uses title case (and did before my edits). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.