Talk:Structure of the Royal Australian Air Force

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Structure of the Royal Australian Air Force is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Table

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

IN the table of Army equivilents it is missing a Division? eg. Section, Platoon, Company, Battalion, Brigade, DIVISION, Corps, Army etc.

Well the question is where does it fit in?

We know that an Air Force equals an Army, and a Brigade equals a Group. The Air Force only has one formation (Command) between them whislt the Army has two (Corps and Division).

I can't find a definitive answer on the internet - this is open for discussion.

Justinbrett 07:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed restructure

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Would there be any objections to restructuring this article along the lines of the (recently updated) official RAAF structure on its website here? (with locations and equipment added) While the current table format looks nice, it's a pain to edit and is a disincentive to keeping this list up to date. It's also totally unsourced, and contains unnecessary information such as the full name and abbreviation of each unit. Nick-D (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've no issues with that proposal, sounds fine to me. Anotherclown (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic