This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Aircorn: re the above, I'd readily concede that the Douglas and Teale stuff can/should go, that was just remarks about McLean in existing articles, with references, so I thought I would include it, but it isn't significant.
However I would assert that the Aberdeen v Motherwell comment and the Inverness v Celtic comment should stay as these were matches of importance and the decisions (not) made by the ref had a direct consequence on the outcomes (please read the sources if not already done so), the Celtic match in particular received widespread media coverage, if you want I can easily find more sources for it, I only did not do so due to not wishing to draw too much attention to it, being aware that it would be unfair to emphasise the rare mistakes more than the consistent good performances which attract little comment. Crowsus (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
