Talk:York

(Redirected from Talk:St George's RC Primary School)
Latest comment: 1 day ago by The joy of all things in topic Towards a GA status for this article
Former good articleYork was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
July 4, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 31, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

edit

Can somene make a seperate image gallery, like used in other English cities inboboxes, e.g. Leeds, Manchester, or Sheffield. 2A0A:EF40:E4A:E101:1571:B33B:5D29:64D9 (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Local government

edit

Shall we update the section on governance of the city? Currently it references the 2019 local election results, but this is out of date. Xtrememachineuk (talk) 10:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've added a maintenance tag stating as much. I don't have the knowledge to update the section myself. Seasider53 (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

GAR concerns

edit

After reviewing this article, I am concerned that it no longer meets the GA criteria. Some of my concerns are below:

  • There are sections that need to be updated, such as the "Local government" section talked about above or the "Demographics" section.
  • There is a lot of uncited sections
  • At over 9,000 words, WP:PAGESIZE recommends that sections of the article be split off or removed.

Is there anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 04:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced sections, orange "updated needed" banners, sections that need updating of recent elections and events, and at over 9000 words it is recommended that the article be split off and information be summarised. Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Towards a GA status for this article

edit

Okay, so we have some work to do - my first proposal would be to lose the table with all the railway destinations and calling points from the transport section. Surely this is too detailed and is covered by the York railway station article. It can be summarised in this article with a section of short prose....?

Thoughts? The joy of all things (talk) 13:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply